Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Camisole - 75184Fr diesen Artikel wurde kein optimales Bild gefunden. Das Bild zeigt einen anderen Artikel aus der selben Modellgruppe. Farbe und Muster knnen stark abweichen. Legere Passform*V Ausschnitt*Spitzenverzierung am Dekollet und Saum*Spaghettitrger*Flieende Qualitt Camisole # Material 93 % Viskose, 7 % Elasthan # Pflegehinweise 30C Pflegeleicht Nicht bleichen Nicht hei bgeln Nicht trockenreinigen Schonende Trocknung ber Mey Die umweltschonende Herstellung
Für diesen Artikel wurde kein optimales Bild gefunden. Das Bild zeigt einen anderen Artikel aus der selben Modellgruppe. Farbe und Muster können stark abweichen.Legere Passform*V-Ausschnitt*Spitzenverzierung am Dekolleté und Saum*Spaghettiträger*Fließende QualitätCamisole
# Material
93 % Viskose, 7 % Elasthan
# Pflegehinweise
30°C Pflegeleicht
Nicht bleichen
Nicht heiß bügeln
Nicht trockenreinigen
Schonende Trocknung
Über Mey
Die umweltschonende Herstellung von Mey wird durch das Bluesign Zertifikat bestätigt.
Lagernd in folgenden Filialen
Farbe: 1804 mystic jade (Farbrichtung: Grün)
| Größe | Kirchdorf | St. Valentin | Schwertberg | Sierning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XS | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| S | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| M | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| L | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| XL | 1 |
Jetzt anrufen und reservieren
Kirchdorf: 📞 +4372587501104
St. Valentin: 📞 +4372587501105
Schwertberg: 📞 +4372587501106
Sierning: 📞 +4372587501111
Kategorie: Damen / Wäsche / Unterhemd Unterkleid Unterrock
Artikelnummern:
4009602849693
4009602849709
4009602849716
4009602849723
4009602849730
4009602849761
4009602849778
4009602849785
4009602849792
4009602849808
4009602875876
4009602875883
4009602875890
4009602875906
4009602875913
4009602936508
4009602936515
4009602936522
4009602936539
4009602936546
4009602936577
4009602936584
4009602936591
4009602936607
4009602936614
4009602989382
4009602989399
4009602989405
4009602989412
4009602989429
4009602989450
4009602989467
4009602989474
4009602989481
4009602989498
4067946017505
4067946017512
4067946017529
4067946017536
4067946017543
4067946017550
4067946057082
4067946057099
4067946057105
4067946057112
4067946057129
4067946057136
4067946104274
4067946104281
4067946104298
4067946104304
4067946104311
4067946104328
4067946160454
4067946160461
4067946160478
4067946160485
4067946160492
4067946160508
4067946172570
4067946172587
4067946172594
4067946172600
4067946172617
4067946172631
4067946172648
4067946172655
4067946172662
4067946172679
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 2253 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great watch
Color: Black/Silver-Tone
Great watch, with many features, specially for those that travel in various time zones.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Typical Ironman quality
Color: Black/Silver-Tone
This is my fourth Timex Ironman watch. I own many watches, and prefer the Ironman for casual wear and sporting activities as well as swimming and snorkeling. I decided to replace an earlier model with this one rather than pay to change the battery.
The Ironman has changed very little over the years since its introduction in the '80s, with the exception of cosmetic improvememnts and a larger display. I selected the "oversize" model as I was looking for a little more heft to this model. This watch fits the bill, not as chunky as my G-Shock. A pleasant surprise was the weight of the watch. This model is lightweight, another advantage over the G. It's larger than the typical Ironman model, but about the same weight. The band lacks the stiffness of some other Timex and Casio models, and is quite comfortable.
Typical Ironman functions are unchanged, and the ability to "hide" various functions makes operation of the watch more efficient. There are three time zones, useful when traveling, as well as the usual chronograph/timer and alarm functions.
I haven't worn the watch in the pool or ocean yet, but if experience is any guide, I expect no problems. I've never had an Ironman leak, whether during water sports or snorkeling.
These are great watches for the money. I prefer 200 meter water resistance for this type of watch, but Timex has yet to build an Ironman 200m that doesn't overwhelm my wrist in weight and size. I'm not a big guy, and they are simply too large for my wrist.
Looking forward to years of service with this watch. Definitely a good timepiece for the price.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Will not be disappointed
Color: Black/Blue
Keeping in mind that I received this item yesterday (2/24/16), I absolutely love this watch. The reason I have so much confidence with this watch is because I've owned one other Timex similar to this one, and it served me extremely well and is still able to do so. First off, this watch is certainly aesthetically pleasing. The blue color around the face of the watch and outline in the band, goes really well with the black frame. It's just an overall nice looking watch. More importantly, the quality seems great. As I mentioned, I've owned a Timex expedition, which I've had for more than 2 years, and it's still working perfectly fine. The watch seems like it's put together very well and there's no loose or flimsy parts. One complaint that many people seem to have with Timex is the quality of their band. Unfortunately I'd have to agree, since the band on my other Timex that's still working like the first day I got it, cracked and broke and is only being held together by the nylon fabric on the other side of the band. You're not going to have that problem with this watch. It's a full nylon band with Velcro adjustment, for precise fitting. it feels extremely comfortable and you won't need to worry about the band cracking (although I'm sure there will be certain defects in a mass produced bunch). I will use this watch for work and running, and rarely plan on taking it off. Just to give you an idea, I also have a garmin gps watch that I love and obviously has more functions than this watch. However, the second I received this watch, I slapped it on and put my garmin to the side. This watch also looks amazing when you wear it. I'll update this feedback as needed, but I'm confident this watch will serve me for years to come, just as my other one has.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2016
★★★★★ 5
Greatest watch I've ever had, but changing batteries is near impossible
Color: Black/Blue
This is the 3rd time I've bought this watch. Same brand, same or very similar model. It has a chronometer, timer, alarm, and of course the clock. It has something I think is for "occasions" but I don't know what it does and don't really care about it. The watch is durable. It uses battery power efficiently. The indiglo is second to none. I just really really like this watch.
Having said all that, if you want to change the batteries, good luck, you'll need it. Once you manage to get the backing off of it and open it up (which is a little tricky in itself), it's like a comedy routine where you see some stooge open an electrical device and a buncha parts and springs go flying everywhere. And of course, they are so tiny, you'll never find them once they fly out. That was the exact scenario I found myself in the last time I tried to change the battery. It made me so mad I actually bought another brand of watch that I thoroughly researched. But that watch DIDN'T use battery power efficiently, and it had a host of other minor problems that added up to the conclusion that it was not nearly as great as this Timex. So, for the 3rd time, I found myself buying this Timex watch.
So it's a wonderful watch in every way except longevity because changing the batteries has historically been a nightmare for me.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 4, 2019
★★★★★ 5
A better Ironman design
Color: Black/Blue
I've been a fan of Timex watches for most of my life, paying about $30 for one in the 1960s, and that hasn't changed at all in 2010 because I'm still paying about $30 for my Timex watches. It is a rare case indeed when the quality of a product continually improves over several decades while the price remains the same. And as John Cameron Swayze would say in those live ads during the early years of TV, "Timex takes a lickin and keeps on tickin".
The MEGA deserves a good review after I have been using it for a while. You might also see it advertized as the "Oversize" because most distinctive about this design is its size, so tagging it with the name MEGA is entirely justified. It is massive in comparison to most of the other Ironman series of watches, and what seemed at first to be just another unnecessary Ironman 30 Lap design has turned out to be one of my favorites for all-around wearing. This new design keeps the clockworks of the standard size 30 Lap Ironman watches, it counts up and down, programs the same, has several alarms, and of course, it has the Indigo night light that works so well.
This is one of five different versions of the Mega available in the USA, and the only one with a Fastwrap Velcro wristband with blue striping and a matching blue bezel. Velcro wristbands are a favorite among many athletes and when it wears out, it can be replaced with either an identical factory band or one that is made of urethane rubber.
Overall, the Mega is a good choice for runners in need of a new 30 lap Ironman who can appreciate having a watch that is distinctively larger and what I would consider to be much better in appearances over the others of standard or mid size Ironman dimensions.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2010