SKU: 92556011846

B7209-E-2RSD-T-P4S-UL FAG

Sale price$93.44 Regular price$103.82
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

B7209-E-2RSD-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Abdichtung: 2RU Two Seals Non Contact Type Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0387742590000 Abdichtung: beidseitig berhrungsfreie Abdichtung Gewicht: 418 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 8000 Erweiterte technische Daten 2RSD Lip Seals On Both Sides, Non Contact ueres Breitenmae: mm 85,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 19,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 19,00 E 25

Technische Basisdaten

Abdichtung: 2RU - Two Seals / Non Contact Type
Hersteller: FAG
Synonym: 0387742590000
Abdichtung: beidseitig berührungsfreie Abdichtung
Gewicht: 418 Gramm
Herstellungsland: Deutschland
Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung
Spannung: geringe Spannung
Zolltarifnummer: 8482 8000


Erweiterte technische Daten

2RSD Lip Seals On Both Sides, Non-Contact
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 85,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 19,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 19,00
E 25° Contact Angle
ECLASS number 23-05-08-03
ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03
Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.4
Innenmaße: mm 45,00
P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9
Paarung G – Universelle Paarung
Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4)
Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 32500
Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 16900
T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C
UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload
Abhebekraft leicht: 782 N
Abhebekraft schwer: 6.261 N
Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 24,7 mm
Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12
Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 52,5 mm
Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 121 N/µm
Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 268 N/µm
Betriebstemperatur max.: 80 °C
Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C
C 0r 16.900 N Statische Tragzahl, radial
C r 32.500 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial
C ur 1.790 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial
Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 32.500 N
Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 1.790 N
F V H 1.994 N Vorspannkraft schwer
F V L 268 N Vorspannkraft leicht
K aE H 6.261 N Abhebekraft schwer
K aE L 782 N Abhebekraft leicht
Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm
Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm
Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1,1 mm
Statische Tragzahl, radial: 16.900 N
T max 80 °C Betriebstemperatur max.
T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min.
Vorspannkraft leicht: 268 N
Vorspannkraft schwer: 1.994 N
a 24,7 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze
c a H 268 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer
c a L 121 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht
d =a 52,5 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter
d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung
r 1 min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
r a max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r a1 max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
≈m 0,418 kg Einzelgewicht
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 92556011846

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 1422 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Judith J Spallino
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Sturdy and Bright!
Number of Items: 2
Sturdy and bright! Great for the driveway
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2026
N
Verified Purchase
NICHOLAS K. LEE
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 1
Extremely Overpriced
Number of Items: 4
It doesn’t hold charge too long , especially if it’s not on a perfectly bright sunny day without clouds. Even at that , It will only be able to light up for maybe two or three hours at best , and not very bright at all. Construction and materials are of good quality that’s why the one start or else zi would gave given a zero if i could. it is way overpriced for what it is. I am disappointed for what I paid and the amount of production I get from it. Would have returned it if I haven’t installed them and threw away the boxes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Twist
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Quality enclosure and battery. Looks great.
Number of Items: 4
Quality metal enclosure. Look great. Two color levels. Charge even in indirect sunlight just fine. I have now bought 12 of these lights.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2025
M
Verified Purchase
Mary
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Very durable and designed to last a long time
Number of Items: 2
I've had a pair of these lights for 7-8 years and would still be using them with no issues if a naughty racoon hadn't taken an interest in them and broken the glass on one of them. I was delighted to find that the identical looking ones (operate slightly differently) were still available. They are extremely simple to put together (just screw together the durable metal pieces) and turn them on to the chosen brightness. It couldn't be much simpler. I also have other Gama Sonic solar lights and they are every bit as good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2024
C
Verified Purchase
Chris J. Cammack
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 3
Gama lights
Number of Items: 4
3 out of 4 are great. One did not work right away. Company send 2 extra battery packs. But still one bad unit. Talking now about options. Company seems to have good customer service. But bad light definetly an issue. 1 of 4 bad.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2026

recommand products