Pay in installments of $20.50 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 24 - Jul 29
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
RS-R SUSPENSION SUPER DOWN FRONT FOR TOYOTA LUCIDA CXR10G MR CXR20G 4WD TCR10G MR TCR20G 4WD T720SFBrand RS R Product Number T720SF Compatible Car TOYOTA LUCIDA CXR10G MR CXR20G 4WD TCR10G MR TCR20G 4WD Product Description Model Year: 1992 1 ~ 1999 12 ENGINE CAPACITY: 2200D TB Series: RS R SUPER DOWN set: F down width (mm): 55 ~ 50 spring rate (kg mm): 3. 00 matching grade: Model Year: 1992 1 ~ 1999 12 ENGINE CAPACITY: 2200D TB Series: RS R SUPER DOWN set: F down width (mm): 55 ~ 50 spring rate (kg mm): 3. 00 matching grade: Model Year: 1992 1 ~
| Brand | RS-R |
| Product Number | T720SF |
| Compatible Car | TOYOTA LUCIDA CXR10G MR CXR20G 4WD TCR10G MR TCR20G 4WD |
| Product Description | Model Year: 1992/1 ~ 1999/12 ENGINE CAPACITY: 2200D TB Series: RS ★ R SUPER DOWN set: F down width (mm): 55 ~ 50 spring rate (kg / mm): 3.00 matching grade: Model Year: 1992/1 ~ 1999/12 ENGINE CAPACITY: 2200D TB Series: RS ★ R SUPER DOWN set: F down width (mm): 55 ~ 50 spring rate (kg / mm): 3.00 matching grade: Model Year: 1992/1 ~ 1999/12 exhaust volume: 2400 NA Series: RS ★ R SUPER dOWN set: F down width (mm): 55 ~ 50 spring rate (kg / mm): 3.00 matching grade: Model Year : 1992/1 ~ 1999/12 exhaust volume: 2400 NA Series: RS ★ R SUPER dOWN set: F down width (mm): 55 ~ 50 spring rate (kg / mm): 3.00 matching grade: |
| Remarks | |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Happy Son
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
My sons loves them. They are all he wears.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect thickness and soft feel.
Size: 6-10, Color: Halo Gray/Assorted
Why did you pick this product vs others?:
Love theses socks. It's hard to find socks which won't get pulled down by athletic shoes. These stay put.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 29, 2025