![DIXCEL BRAKE PAD TYPE P REAR 2550083-P [Compatibility List in Desc.]](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0644/3486/4197/files/main_ph_pre_bc733c3e-718d-42da-a6cf-b36dffc91bfb.jpg?v=1742327072)
Pay in installments of $21.30 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 7 - Aug 12
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
DIXCEL BRAKE PAD TYPE P REAR 2550083-P [Compatibility List in Desc.]Brand DIXCEL Product Number 2550083 P Compatible Car #REF! Product Description Model Grade: 1. 6 1. 8i _x000D_ _x000D_ Premium type _x000D_ Premium type brake pads, the fusion of reasonable pricing and brake performance _x000D_ Performance brake pads for the price similar to OEM brake pads _x000D_ Improved brake performance, decrease in brake dust. _x000D_ The same long pad life as the OEM brake pads _x000D_ Even higher brake performance by changing
| Brand | DIXCEL |
| Product Number | 2550083-P |
| Compatible Car | #REF! |
| Product Description | Model Grade: 1.6 / 1.8i _x000D_ _x000D_ Premium type _x000D_ Premium-type brake pads, the fusion of reasonable pricing and brake performance _x000D_ Performance brake pads for the price similar to OEM brake pads _x000D_ Improved brake performance, decrease in brake dust. _x000D_ The same long pad life as the OEM brake pads _x000D_ Even higher brake performance by changing to DIXCEL brake discs at the same time as your brake pads! _x000D_ Price for European & American Cars: Front :: JPY10,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Rear :: JPY8,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Friction Materials: Ceramic fiber / Copper Free (2021 regulations) _x000D_ Max u: 0.58 _x000D_ Ave u: 0.40 _x000D_ Min u: 0.39 _x000D_ Applicable Stages: Street Compatible Vehicles: ALFAROMEO 75 85 ~ 89/10 ALFAROMEO 75 162B40 85 ~ 89/10 ALFAROMEO 75 162 / 162B30 85 ~ 89/10 ALFAROMEO ALFETTA 83 ~ 86 ALFAROMEO ALFETTA 83 ~ 86 ALFAROMEO GTV 83 ~ 86 ALFAROMEO GTV 86 ~ 87 ALFAROMEO RZ 92 ~ ALFAROMEO SZ 89 ~ |
| Remarks | Double Sensor car _x000D_ The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only. The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use. _x000D_ DIXCEL is NOT responsible for any damage that may occur from using the Premium-type . brake pads on a race circuit ALFAROMEO 75 85 ~ 89/10: Double Sensor car ALFAROMEO 75 162B40 85 ~ 89/10: Double Sensor car ALFAROMEO 75 162 / 162B30 85 ~ 89/10: Double Sensor car ALFAROMEO ALFETTA 83 ~ 86:.. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use ALFAROMEO ALFETTA 83 ~ 86: The Premium-type brake pads .. are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use ALFAROMEO GTV 83 ~ 86:. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use <. br> ALFAROMEO GTV 86 ~ 87:. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use ALFAROMEO RZ 92 ~:.. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use ALFAROMEO SZ 89 ~:.. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use. |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Excellent Work-out & Biking Short
Special Size: 7" Inseam without Pockets, Size: Small, Color: Ocean Blue
I love these biker shorts. They have just the right amount of lycra and they are super soft. They are true to size, and they fit perfectly on my 5'2", 125-pound frame. I purchased them for use in bike riding, and I am very pleased with the fit and stretch. The inseam length is perfect for bike riding, and the legs don't ride up my thigh. The only con to all the pros is there isn't a phone pocket. I ride my bike around town, and I would have liked to have a pocket for my phone when going inside a store. These shorts are well worth the price. I purchased three different colors and love them all. I would definitely purchase this item again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Cute but could use some pockets
Special Size: 6" Inseam Contrast Trim without Pockets, Size: Small, Color: Navy/White
Obsessed with these shorts. They are so cute and comfy. They fit true to size and I love that there is a matching top you can buy separately. I feel like the material is pretty thick and I don't have to worry about it being see through. My only complaint is that there are no pockets.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect workout shorts!
Special Size: 5" Inseam without Pockets, Size: Medium, Color: Black
Very comfortable and soft material. Great price! Perfect for workouts! Doesn't ride up or have constant pulling on them!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice fabric
Special Size: 7" Inseam with Pockets, Size: X-Large, Color: Taupe
These are well made. The fabric is perfect! Not thin. I was disappointed that I ordered a size that was too large. I had to return. I need to get updated body measurements before reordering.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Buy buy buy!!!!
Special Size: 7" Inseam with Pockets, Size: Large, Color: Taupe
Fantastic! I got These a while back k in another color and needed another pair. I got the green, can you say wow! This color is beautiful and bright! They are as comfortable as my other ones! Worth every dime!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026