Pay in installments of $37.49 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary WifeExploring the Artistic Depth of Arshile Gorky's "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" Understanding Arshile Gorky: A Pioneer of Abstract Expressionism The Life and Times of Arshile Gorky Arshile Gorky, born in 1904 in Armenia, emerged as a significant figure in the Abstract Expressionism movement. His tumultuous early life, marked by the Armenian Genocide, deeply influenced his artistic vision. Gorky immigrated to the United States in 1920, where
Exploring the Artistic Depth of Arshile Gorky's "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife"
Understanding Arshile Gorky: A Pioneer of Abstract Expressionism
The Life and Times of Arshile Gorky
Arshile Gorky, born in 1904 in Armenia, emerged as a significant figure in the Abstract Expressionism movement. His tumultuous early life, marked by the Armenian Genocide, deeply influenced his artistic vision. Gorky immigrated to the United States in 1920, where he faced the challenges of adapting to a new culture while grappling with his past. His experiences shaped his identity and artistic expression, making him a vital voice in 20th-century art.Influences on Gorky's Artistic Journey
Gorky's work reflects a blend of influences, including Surrealism, Cubism, and the vibrant colors of the American landscape. He was inspired by artists like Pablo Picasso and Joan Miró, who encouraged him to explore abstraction. Gorky's exposure to European modernism and his personal experiences created a unique artistic language that resonated with the emotional depth of his subjects.Gorky's Unique Style: Merging Surrealism and Abstraction
Gorky's style is characterized by a fusion of surreal imagery and abstract forms. He often used organic shapes and fluid lines to convey emotion and thought. This innovative approach allowed him to express complex ideas about identity and existence, making his work both visually striking and intellectually engaging.Decoding "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife"
The Concept of Identity in Gorky's Work
In "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife," Gorky delves into the theme of identity. The painting serves as a reflection of his inner self and the duality of his existence. Gorky explores the tension between reality and imagination, inviting viewers to consider their own identities and relationships.Imaginary Companionship: The Role of the 'Imaginary Wife'
The 'Imaginary Wife' in the painting symbolizes Gorky's longing for companionship and connection. This figure represents both an idealized partner and a manifestation of his inner thoughts. The presence of this imaginary figure highlights Gorky's emotional landscape, revealing his vulnerabilities and desires.Color Palette and Composition: A Visual Analysis
Gorky's use of a vibrant color palette enhances the emotional impact of the painting. Rich reds, deep blues, and soft yellows create a dynamic interplay that draws the viewer in. The composition, with its swirling forms and layered textures, invites exploration and contemplation, making it a captivating visual experience.The Emotional Resonance of Gorky's Portrait
Expressing Vulnerability and Introspection
Gorky's portrait captures a profound sense of vulnerability. The expressive brushstrokes and abstract forms convey a deep introspection, allowing viewers to connect with the artist's emotional state. This raw honesty resonates with anyone who has experienced the complexities of love and loss.The Symbolism of Figures and Forms
The figures in Gorky's painting are not merely representations; they are symbols of his inner turmoil and aspirations. Each shape and line carries meaning, reflecting Gorky's thoughts on existence, love, and the human condition. This layered symbolism invites multiple interpretations, enriching the viewer's experience.Interpreting the Mood: A Journey Through Emotion
The mood of "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" oscillates between melancholy and hope. Gorky's ability to evoke such a range of emotions speaks to his mastery as an artist. The painting encourages viewers to embark on their own emotional journey, prompting reflection on their relationships and identities.Artistic Techniques and Innovations in the Painting
Brushwork and Texture: Techniques that Define Gorky
Gorky's distinctive brushwork creates a sense of movement and depth. He employed a variety of techniques, including layering and glazing, to achieve rich textures. This innovative approach adds a tactile quality to the painting, inviting viewers to engage with it on a sensory level.Layering and Depth: Creating a Sense of Space
The layering of colors and forms in Gorky's work creates a three-dimensional effect. This technique enhances the sense of space within the painting, allowing viewers to feel as if they are stepping into Gorky's world. The depth adds complexity, encouraging a deeper exploration of the themes presented.Color Theory: The Impact of Color Choices on Perception
Gorky's strategic use of color theory plays a crucial role in shaping the viewer's perception. The contrasting colors evoke specific emotions, guiding the audience's response to the painting. This thoughtful application of color enhances the overall impact, making the artwork a powerful emotional experience.The Cultural and Historical Context of the Painting
Post-War America: Art as a Reflection of Society
"Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" emerged during a time of significant change in America. Post-World War II, artists sought new ways to express the complexities of modern life. Gorky's work reflects this cultural shift, addressing themes of identity, loss, and the search for meaning in a rapidly changing world.Gorky's Place in the New York Art Scene
Gorky became a central figure in the New York art scene, influencing many artists who followed. His innovative approach to abstraction and emotional expression paved the way for future movements, including Abstract Expressionism. Gorky's legacy continues to inspire contemporary artists seeking to explore the depths of human experience.Influence of European Modernism on Gorky's Work
Gorky's exposure to European modernism profoundly shaped his artistic vision. The techniques and philosophies he encountered in Europe informed his approach to abstraction and expression. This blend of influences resulted in a unique style that bridged the gap between European and American art.Legacy and Impact of "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife"
How This Painting Influenced Future Generations of Artists
Gorky's "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" has left a lasting impact on the art world. Its exploration of identity and emotion has inspired countless artists to delve into their own experiences. The painting serves as a testament to the power of art to communicate complex human feelings.Critical Reception: Art Critics and Their Perspectives
Art critics have praised Gorky's work for its emotional depth and innovative techniques. "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" has been analyzed for its unique approach to identity and companionship. Critics recognize Gorky's ability to convey profound themes through abstract forms, solidifying his place in art history.Current Relevance: Why This Painting Still Matters Today
Today, Gorky's painting remains relevant as it addresses universal themes of love, loss, and identity. In a world where these issues continue to resonate, Gorky's work invites viewers to reflect on their own lives. The emotional honesty of "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" ensures its place in contemporary discussions about art and humanity.Frequently Asked Questions About "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife"
What is the significance of the title "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife"?
The title reflects Gorky's exploration of identity and the longing for companionship. It highlights the duality of his existence, merging reality with imagination.How does Gorky's personal life influence this painting?
Gorky's tumultuous personal experiences, including loss and displacement, deeply inform the emotional depth of the painting. His struggles with identity and relationships are central themes.What emotions does Gorky aim to convey through this artwork?
Gorky seeks to express vulnerability, introspection, and the complexities of love. The painting captures a range of emotions, inviting viewers to connect with their own experiences.What techniques did Gorky use to create depth in this painting?
Gorky employed layering, brushwork, and color theory to create depth. These techniques enhance the three-dimensional quality of the painting, drawing viewers into his emotional landscape.How does this painting reflect the themes of identity and companionship?
The painting explores the tension between reality and imagination, highlighting Gorky's search for identity and connection. The 'Imaginary Wife' symbolizes his longing for companionship.What should I know about the reproduction of this painting?
Art reproductions of "Portrait of Myself and My Imaginary Wife" offer a superior alternative to prints. They capture the texture and depth of the original artwork, allowing for a more authentic experience.Are there different styles of reproductions available for this artwork?
Yes, various styles of reproductions are available, including canvas and framed options. Each reproduction aims to reflect the original's vibrancy and emotional depth, making them a valuable addition to any art collection.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Exposing the Roots of Christian Nationalism
Format: eTextbook
Kevin M. Kruse’s One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian America dismantles the enduring myth that the United States was founded as a “Christian nation.” Instead, Kruse demonstrates how this identity was deliberately constructed in the mid‑20th century as a political strategy. Beginning in the 1930s, business leaders alarmed by Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal sought to counter what they perceived as government “slavery.” To resist these reforms, they partnered with clergy and promoted the idea of “freedom under God,” blending economic resistance with religious appeal.
This alliance reached its zenith during Dwight Eisenhower’s presidency. Eisenhower expanded religion’s role in public life, inaugurating the National Prayer Breakfast, adding “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance, and making “In God We Trust” the official national motto. These initiatives reshaped American identity, fueling a surge in church membership and embedding religious language into civic rituals. The phrase “one nation under God” became a widely accepted marker of patriotism, crossing political and denominational lines.
Kruse’s central argument is that Christian nationalism was not inherited from the Founders but deliberately cultivated by corporate and political interests in the 20th century. By exposing its origins, he reveals how this “invented tradition” continues to shape and divide American politics today.
C.S. Lewis, in The Screwtape Letters, anticipated this danger with remarkable clarity. He warned that the gravest temptation is not outright disbelief but the subtle corruption of faith—when Christianity is treated as a means to another end rather than as an end in itself. Lewis’s insight resonates with Kruse’s account: both show how faith can be co‑opted when believers confuse God’s kingdom with Caesar’s.
History is important, but it is equally important that we do not allow bad history to repeat—or even to rhyme—when each stanza leads us further from God. Kruse provides the historical scaffolding, Lewis the theological discernment. Together they invite us to vigilance: to name the temptations of Christian nationalism, to resist its allure, and to anchor our communities in the truth that God’s kingdom cannot be co‑opted by worldly power.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Even-handed History of America's Religious Roots
Format: eTextbook
One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian America by Kevin Kruse
“One Nation Under God" is an even-handed book that makes the record clear on where America’s religious identity came from. Professor Kevin Kruse makes the compelling historical case that America’s religious identity had its roots in the domestic politics against Roosevelt’s New Deal of the 1930s and 1940s. This scholarly 386-page book includes eight chapters broken out into the following three parts: I. Creation, II. Consecration, and III. Conflict.
Positives:
1. Interesting and well-written book. Fair and respectful treatment.
2. A fascinating premise, how Corporate America invented a Christian America.
3. Kruse does not waste time in establishing his thesis for the book. “This book argues, the postwar revolution in America’s religious identity had its roots not in the foreign policy panic of the 1950s but rather in the domestic politics of the 1930s and early 1940s.”
4. The origins of the union of Christianity and capitalism. “At First Congregational and elsewhere, the minister reached out warmly to the wealthy, assuring them that their worldly success was a sign of God’s blessings and brushing off the criticism of clergymen who disagreed.”
5. The anti-New Deal movement. “For Fifield and his associates, the phrase “freedom under God”—in contrast with what they saw as oppression under the federal government—became an effective new rallying cry in the early 1950s.”
6. The role that Billy Graham played in American politics. “As the Washington crusade began in January 1952, Graham made clear his intent to influence national politics.”
7. It’s always interesting to read about the fathers of prominent politicians and religious leaders of today or recent past. See how many you find.
8. Political opportunism illustrated. “Vereide recognized that the tensions of the Cold War could be exploited to win more converts to his cause.”
9. A comprehensive look at the history of the National Day of Prayer. “In an apparent nod to the previous year’s “Freedom Under God” observance, which was set to be repeated in 1952, Truman selected the Fourth of July as the date for the first National Day of Prayer.”
10. Eisenhower unlikely role as the spiritual leader of a nation. “Eisenhower’s relationship with the Freedoms Foundation ran back to its founding. In his first meeting with Belding in September 1948, he discovered that the ad man shared his belief that the free enterprise system was in desperate need of defense.” “FOR EISENHOWER, THE “GOVERNMENT UNDER God” theme of the first prayer breakfast became a blueprint for his entire administration.”
11. Key stats that show the influence of religion and politics. “The decade and a half after the Second World War, however, saw a significant surge: the percentage claiming a church membership climbed to 57 percent in 1950 and then spiked to an all-time high of 69 percent at the end of the decade.”
12. The drive to declare the United States as one based on the Bible. In God We Trust. “In July 1953, the National Association of Evangelicals arranged to have Eisenhower, Nixon, and other high-ranking officials sign a statement declaring that the United States government was based on biblical principles.”
13. Interesting tidbits about our founding fathers. “The founding fathers had felt no need to acknowledge “the law and authority of Jesus Christ,” and neither had subsequent generations of American legislators.”
14. A comprehensive look at the history of the Pledge of Allegiance. “THE ORIGINAL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, much like the Constitution itself, did not acknowledge the existence of God. Its author, Francis Bellamy, a Baptist minister from Rome, New York, was a decidedly religious man, but when he wrote the pledge in the 1890s he described himself as something that would seem an oxymoron in Eisenhower’s America: a ‘Christian socialist’.”
15. Interesting history on the need to create an illusion of historical accuracy.
16. Separation of church and state. “The justice reached back to borrow a metaphor coined in a letter to his fellow Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut, two and a half centuries before. “In the words of Jefferson,” Black wrote, “the clause against establishment of religion by laws was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between church and state.” “Religious liberty was essential, he told his wife, because “when one religion gets predominance, they immediately try to suppress the others.”
17. A look at the quest for school prayer amendment. The tactics used by both sides. “The issue is that agencies of government cannot avoid favoring one denomination and hurting another by the practical decisions that have to be made by government authority on what version of the Bible shall be imposed and what prayer. The churches know this and that is why they are against the Becker Amendment.”
18. Prayers at the White House. “In creating a “kind of sanctuary” in the East Room, Nixon committed the very sin the founders had sought to avoid.”
19. Republicans use of religion for political gain. “Much as Reagan used school prayer as a partisan issue, Bush used the pledge.”
20. An excellent epilogue.
21. Notes included. A section of abbreviations.
Negatives:
1. Interesting but on the dry side. The book is scholarly but the author lacks flare.
2. Lacks conviction. The book feels more like a cold report than an engaging thesis.
3. Charts and timelines would have added value.
4. No formal bibliography.
5. At $14.92 for a Kindle book when the Hardcover was available for $15.70 at time of purchase may hurt some trees.
In summary, this is really a 3.5 star book but I’m feeling generous. On the one hand, it’s an interesting topic that is covered in a fair and respectful manner while on the other hand it lacks panache. Kruse provides great insights into the evolution of the religious right and makes a compelling case of their true origins. A worthwhile book to read, I recommend it!
Further recommendations: “Why the Religious Right Is Wrong about Separation of Church and State” by Robert Boston, “Nonbeliever Nation” by David Niose, “The Dark Side of Christian History” by Helen Ellerbe, “Birth Control, Insurance Coverage, & the Religious Right” by A.F. Alexander, “The God Argument” by A.C. Grayling, “Freethinkers” by Susan Jacoby, “Moral Combat” by Sikivu Hutchinson, “Republican Gomorrah” by Max Blumenthal, “American Fascists” by Chris Hedges, “Doubt” by Jennifer Michael Hecht, and “Society Without God” by Phil Zuckerman.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2015
★★★★★ 5
A book from the real No Spin Zone
Format: eTextbook
Like so many others this book is about politics. What it is not - is another one of those research deficient screeds that are one percent fact and 99 percent fantasy pulled out of someone's behind. It is fully annotated, with references and a bibliography that is both impressive for its references and its sources. Every paragraph and every assertion is factcheckable. Names, dates and places are attached to the narrative leaving the debunkers little room to quibble.
It begins with the Election of DD Eisenhower in 1952 and describes, in an exhaustively researched narrative, how we have through the succeeding administrations erroneously come to believe that we are a Christian Nation instead of a Nation of Christians. The meticulousness of the references prevents it from being a page turner, but it is a fascinating read for those who believe the Conservatives have hijacked God and the Flag, but don't know how it happened. Kruse details the process and the players during the 63 years Americans have been turned from a more liberal secularism to a more conservative sectarianism.
Conservatives will not like the obvious conclusions to be drawn from "One Nation Under God", but they will find a lot to like in it. As I read certain passages I could almost hear them echoing, "THAT'S RIGHT" and "Of COURSE", not realizing they are affirming sectarianism and authoritarianism which are contrary to their reverently held Constitution. Liberals, who feel that the Conservatives have appropriated patriotism as their exclusive property, will find the facts to support their own Constitutional ideals.
I give it 5 stars for scholarliness, sticking to the facts, timeliness, historical veracity, and as a book that will become a valuable reference for future study.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2015
★★★★★ 5
One Nation Under God.....Divisible
Format: Hardcover
"How Corporate America invented Christian America" is a perfect subtitle to Kevin Kruse's excellent book, "One Nation Under God", for as the author discusses, this is what happened to our culture over the course of several decades. It's an eye-opener and he presents an offering full of depth and insight.
As Kruse reminds us in the epilogue, the source of America's becoming a "Christian" nation stems from the vitriol of those clergymen who opposed the New Deal. James Fifield and Abraham Vereide, two early proponents of this new America they sought, gave way to Billy Graham and Pat Robertson, who cemented the fact that God and the Republican party were joined at the hip.
A large part of the book deals with how U.S. presidents dealt with the issue. Dwight Eisenhower presided over the change in the Pledge of Allegiance to include, "One Nation under God" and that American currency now bore the phrase "In God We Trust". His chapters lay the necessary groundwork nicely for the two most revealing chapters, "Our So-Called Religious Leaders", which largely deal with efforts to pass a constitutional amendment requiring school prayer, and "Which Side Are You On?", an intense look at how shamelessly Richard Nixon and his administration publicy made God "their own".
While it is hard to imagine today the thousands of billboards and leaflets displayed in the manner that they were in the 1960s, the undercurrent of nastiness that exists to "promote" God remains. You can hear it in the Tea Party. What Kevin Kruse reminds us is that religion was, and still is, as divisive a force as any we have had in the past and have in America today.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2015
★★★★★ 5
How Corporate America created free-enterprise Jesus to undo the New Deal
This book tells the history of how corporate America have tried to undo New Deal reforms since the 1940s by creating a new free-enterprise religion, and to erode the separation of church and state.
Corporate America’s creation of a free-enterprise selfish Jesus began in 1935 with the founding of an organization called Spiritual Mobilization. Some of the corporations who donated money to this and similar organizations include: American Cyanamid and chemical corporation, Associated Refineries, AT&T, Bechtel Corporation, Caterpillar Tractor Company, Chevrolet, Chicago & Southern Airline, Chrysler corporation, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Deering-Milliken, Detroit Edison, Disney, DuPont, Eastern Airlines, General Electric, General Foods, General Motors, Goodwill, Goodyear Tire & Rubber, IBM, J. C. Penney, J. Walter Thompson, Mark A. Hanna, Marriott, Marshall Field, Monsanto Chemical Company, National Association of Manufacturers, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance, Paramount Pictures, PepsiCo, Precision Valve Corp, Quaker Oats, Republic Steel Corp, Richfield Oil Co., San Diego Gas & Electric, Schick Safety Razor, Standard Oil Company, Sun Oil company, Sun shipbuilding company, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation, United Airlines, US Rubber company, US steel corporation, Utah Power & Light, Warner Bros. Pictures, Weyerhauser.
In the 1930s, corporations were well known to have brought on the Great Depression with their tremendous greed and dishonesty. The New Deal reformed the financial system, distributed wealth more evenly, provided a social safety net, protected the people by regulating businesses to protect them from unsafe and unhealthy food, drugs, and other products, toxic pollution, aided farmers in slowing soil erosion to prevent more dust bowls (and feed Americans for hundreds of years-- good topsoil is America’s most important treasure), and other public services that benefited everyone.
The New Deal embodied the ideals of the Social Gospel, a movement dedicated to the public good, economic equality, eradication of poverty, slums, child labor, an unclean environment, inadequate labor unions, poor schools, and war (Wiki Social Gospel).
Corporate America fought against these reforms and has been trying to undo the New Deal ever since then.
One of their most successful tactics was getting religious leaders to spout a new version of Jesus – a free-enterprise, Ayn Rand, selfish Jesus and eradicate the Social Gospel Jesus of the New Deal.
At first ministers and people saw through since this propaganda was obviously craven corporate self-interest.
So the propaganda was crafted more subtly, and sold to conservative religious leaders. Congregations then listened to sermons about the free-enterprise Jesus with open hearts and minds, which they would have laughed at if the speaker were a CEO. The new religion taught them to hate unions, social welfare, to fear and hate government, to be against abortion and birth control (mainly because the more people there are, the less industries have to pay them). It was broadcast from conservative religious radio and TV stations, and in the secular world.
This is why you don’t have a chance of talking Uncle Bob out of voting for demagogues at the Thanksgiving table – you’re attacking his religion and core beliefs he’s heard since his first sermon, and his brain shuts down in anger. He’s been taught since he was a baby that he should hate and fear government, not corporations.
People like to say that capitalism is imperfect, but the best system that exists. Well, it’s great at raping, pillaging, and poisoning land, water, and air than any other system. Industrial farming is depleting aquifers and eroding and compacting top soil to the point where it won’t produce much food after centuries rather than millennia. Global conventional oil production, where 90% of our oil comes from, peaked in 2005 (Aleklett et al. 2012; Kerr 2011; Murray 2012; Newby 2011; IEA 2010; Zittel et al. 2013), declining at a rate of 6% now and increasing to 9% by 2030 (Hook 2009). According to the Department of Energy, you’d want to prepare at least 20 years ahead of time for peak oil (Hirsch 2005), yet here we are 12 years after peak conventional oil, with both Democrats and Republicans assuming that endless growth on a finite planet will fix things. We don’t have endless energy, it turns out that earth is not a giant gas tank, and even if it were, exponential growth would drain it in centuries.
There isn’t a single endeavor that doesn’t depend on energy, especially supply chains, mining, logging, construction, and road building, which are done with heavy-duty trucks, which can only accomplish their work with diesel engines that burn only diesel (Friedemann 2015).
Since the social net is funded by an ever-expanding working population and growth, social security and Medicare are Ponzi schemes, as well as our financial system, which depends on growth to pay back debt. The corporations are about to get the death of the New Deal they’ve so wanted via the decline of our fossil-fueled civilization.
There is no political party that can fix this, so it’s time to strengthen your community to become more resilient, self-sufficient, and able to supply food and other essentials locally. To fix water and sewage infrastructure. It’s time to embrace the social gospel and help community members less fortunate than you in the years ahead.
Aleklett, K., et al. 2012. Peeking at peak oil. Berlin: Springer.
Hook, M., et al. 2009. Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production. Energy Policy 37(6):2262–2272.
Friedemann, A. 2015. When trucks stop running, Energy and the Future of Transportation. Springer.
Kerr, R. 2011. Peak oil production may already be here. Science 331:1510–11.
Murray, J., et al. 2012. Oil’s tipping point has passed. Nature 481:43–4.
Newby, J. 2011. Oil Crunch (Fatih Birol). Catalyst. ABC TV.
IEA. 2010. World energy outlook 2010, 116. International Energy Agency.
Zittel, W, et al. 2013. Fossil and nuclear fuels. Energy Watch Group.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2017