SKU: 82242755447

Edenswear Side-Snap Bear-Wrap Babysuit with Zinc-Infused Fabric for Skin with Eczema

Sale price$531.00 Regular price$590.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $147.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Edenswear Side-Snap Bear-Wrap Babysuit with Zinc-Infused Fabric for Skin with EczemaFeatures RELIEF FOR SENSITIVE SKIN Protects and provides relief for babies with sensitive, delicate skin and, other skin conditions. Fine, lightweight fabric is highly pliable and breathable for extra comfort against the skin SMART FABRIC Tencel blended with Smartcel Sensitive fabric releases tiny amounts of zinc oxide to help to regenerate the skin, improve the healing of wounds and reduce inflammation OEKO TEX Standard 100 Certified free of more

Features

☆ RELIEF FOR SENSITIVE SKIN - Protects and provides relief for babies with sensitive, delicate skin and, other skin conditions. Fine, lightweight fabric is highly pliable and breathable for extra comfort against the skin

☆ SMART FABRIC - Tencel blended with Smartcel Sensitive fabric releases tiny amounts of zinc oxide to help to regenerate the skin, improve the healing of wounds and reduce inflammation

☆ OEKO-TEX Standard 100 Certified free of more than 100 regulated and unregulated substances known to be harmful

 

☆ LIGHT AND COMFY - Fine, lightweight fabric is highly pliable and breathable for extra comfort against the skin

☆ LONG LASTING & MACHINE-WASHABLE - Even after multiple washing cycles, the material will continue to release zinc and remain effective


    Product description

     Cute and gentle...

    Get some relief from irritated skin with these super cute Zinc-infused Butterfly Romper for boys and girls from Edesnswear. Extra light for quick drying comfort, these rompers are silky against the skin and won’t trap perspiration or odors ensuring your baby feels comfy all day or night. Six colors to choose from with gentle dyes, their OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification ensures they are free from the hundreds of harmful chemicals commonly found in modern garments. The rompers are secured by bowties at the top corners and snaps at the bottom.

    ...with advanced features!
    Tencel mixed with Smartcel Sensitive makes the romper durable and feel great against the skin. At the same time it provides even more natural protection than cotton and releases tiny amounts of zinc oxide, a vital trace element that helps protect the skin. Tencel and Smartcel are advanced wood-pulp based fibers created in Germany. In addition to being environmentally friendly and having natural healing properties, it feels softer than cotton without the plasticky feel of synthetics.

    Sizing
    Please refer to detailed size chart above. If in doubt, choose the bigger size. Edenswear garments tend toward smaller sizing.
    Small: 23.5” / 60 cm tall
    Medium: 27.5” / 70 cm tall
    Large: 31.5” / 80 cm tall



    Care instructions
    - Should be washed gently to preserve zinc content
    - Hand wash or wash on gentle cycle
    - Do not bleach or use harsh detergents
    - Do not dry in the dryer; Do not dry clean
    - Ironing not necessary

    Specifications
    75% Tencel; 19% Smartcel Sensitive; 6% spandex
    Contains medically approved zinc oxide: Not suitable for those with zinc oxide allergies. Zinc is a natural resource and allergies are very rare
    OEKO-TEX Standard 100 Certified: Free from the hundreds of harmful chemicals commonly found in modern garments

    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 82242755447

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.9 ★★★★★
    Based on 16 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    W
    Verified Purchase
    WellBCare
    Grantham, US
    ★★★★★ 2
    Be clear that it's a blank journal you create, with brief quotes and thumbnail art
    Format: Paperback
    If one is looking for a personal journal of empty lined pages ~ and a brief Lilias Trotter quote with a thumbnail-size photo of her art on each page then this is for you. I understood it was a book of her journalling with more viewable-size sketches.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2022
    E
    Verified Purchase
    Eric Balkan
    Charlottesville, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    When and where economics went wrong
    Format: Paperback
    This is one of those books that can provide an epiphany to the reader -- but not very many American readers have even heard of it, unfortunately. That could be due to it's being a book primarily about English economic history, with assumptions that the reader is familiar to some extent with things like the Poor Laws and Tory socialism. But I wasn't, and was still able to glean some great insights from the work. That could be because Polanyi is not afraid of repetition. :-) A key insight, and the one that could be summed up as the theme of the book, is Polanyi's realization that prior to about 1830, the market and the economy were considered part of society. That is, economic activity was something that people did along with everything else they did, like engage in social/familial relationships, religious rituals, etc. But with the 1830s came a paradigm shift: the advent of rational capitalism. Now, the market was considered an entity by itself, outside of society. This market entity was viewed as governed by universal laws. Like laws of physics, these market laws were independent of culture, independent of social group, independent of time period, and, in fact, independent of human behavior. While any observer of human nature would say that people often make decisions for emotional reasons -- and modern neurological research shows that virtually every decision we make is a combination of the rational and the emotional -- these market laws assumed only rational behavior on the part of economic actors. Though Polanyi doesn't mention it, it's now easy to see how Alfred Marshall could get carried away with creating a mathematical foundation for microeconomics and how Leon Walras could, reportedly, say that if something couldn't be studied mathematically, it wasn't worth studying. There's no current way to model emotions with math, and so the Ricardian prototype of an emotion-less economics continues into the modern economics of today. These universal market laws frees the market from any social constraints. A number of modern neo-classical economists assert that this makes economics purely amoral, i.e., without regard for any ethics. Therefore any attempts by the public, by politicians, or by workers to add ethics to the market is an interference with pure market workings, which, according to their interpretation of Adam Smith's "invisible hand", will produce optimal results if just left alone. But Smith never said that, and in fact rational capitalism, in elevating greed and selfishness to the status of goals -- see the Ayn Rand work "The Virtue Of Selfishness" -- is, IMO, not amoral at all, but rather is a morality of its own. Anyway, back to Polanyi's insights. Another key one is the concept of a "double movement" in 19th century England. Each move to create a purer market created an ad-hoc counter move. E.g., Ricardian free trade was faced with opposition from workers losing their jobs and local firms losing business Americans can easily think of another example: where the employment of children (eventually) led to laws restricting that employment, simply because human beings have too much of a sympathetic nature to sit still for children losing limbs in the dangerous factories and mines of the time. Polanyi notes that capitalists often blame these anti-capitalist laws on planned activity by socialist anti-market groups, but he says they're actually the result of the recognition by the general public that they don't want to live under a pure market system. Yet another good insight is Polanyi's recognition that market laws treat labor, land, and money as commodities. We can see that today, where neo-classical economists assert that the law of supply and demand should apply to workers as it applies to anything else in the economy. That is, if there's a surplus of workers in one area and a shortage in another, supply and demand dictates the flow of workers from the one area to the other. But a laid-off textile worker in South Carolina is not going to move to China for a job. That's my own example, but Polanyi offers his own from modern English history. The book isn't perfect. Polanyi does have a tendency to generalize, a common failing among authors, IMO. E.g., in discussing the rise of fascism in the 1930s, he's on very shaky ground when he starts talking about the US or about Russian policy intentions during that period. I gave The Great Transformation 5 stars because, even with its faults, the reader will be thinking about Polanyi's insights for some time to come. I am.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2009
    K
    Verified Purchase
    Kindle Customer
    Battle Creek, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Not light reading but worth it
    Format: Kindle
    Much of this book was heavy reading for me, mainly due my not being familiar with the background development and history of various economic theory and associated laws over 500 or so years of British history. I did stick it out and am glad I did. There are many insights as to how we have arrived at today and the book is still relevant even though it was written in 1942. I found the last few chapters and the comments in Sources to offer the most explanations to fit modern times especially with regard to the rise of fascism. Thick but worth it.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2025
    B
    Verified Purchase
    Blake West
    Bozeman, US
    ★★★★★ 4
    Interesting anthropology and critique, but dense and obtuse writing
    Format: Kindle
    The good part is that at the end of the day, I learned a lot here, and Polanyi raised a lot of very interesting and under-discussed historical points to create his argument. It felt very similar to David Graeber (or I guess Graeber is similar to Polanyi) in that way. The bad part is that, whereas Graeber writes with exceptional clarity and vividness, Polanyi is obtuse and dense. And I've read other books from this era, I don't think it's the time. I think it's Polanyi's writing. Beyond that, his work serves more as analysis than prescription. It's a bit unclear exactly what he's advocating for. Which maybe is OK, though I prefer when non fiction writers offer solutions rather than just pointing out problems. All in all, if you can settle in with his writing, there are definite gems in there.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026
    K
    Verified Purchase
    Kitty Bryant
    Boise, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Inspiring analysis of economic history
    Format: Paperback
    Polanyi presents economic history through an analysis of the "utopian" catastrophy of the self-regulating market economy. Polanyi argues that the free market economy treats the most essential elements of human society - labor, nature, and money - as if they should be exploited like commodities. When liberalism (free marketeerism) rules, then the economy dictates what is possible in human society, and these rules are intolerable because they create conditions under which humans are impoverished and disempowered. In his final chapter he lays out the battle ground between liberalism and its alternatives, which when he was writing (1945) were socialism and fascism. Fascism refuses the dictates of economic liberalism but substitutes in its place the dictates of a state that denies individual freedom. Socialism, alternatively, holds the only promise of true freedom for the individual where economic and political rules are developed and enforced democratically for the protection of society. While this is not an easy read because it demands a background in history, he is a fluent and persuasive writer.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2023

    recommand products