SKU: 13931266440

Holley 0-80508S 750CFM 4-bbll Classic Holley Carburetor Electric Choke

Sale price$242.98 Regular price$269.98
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $67.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 12 - Aug 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Holley 0-80508S 750CFM 4-bbll Classic Holley Carburetor Electric ChokeOverview: One of the most widely used Holley carbs of all times the 0 80508S! Its dual feed fuel inlets assure you get all the fuel you need and its 750 CFM of airflow makes it the perfect performance upgrade carb. Its vacuum secondaries and electric choke make it super easy to use on a wide range of vehicles. Don't trust your performance to just anyone, Holley is the only modular carburetor company that has been in business for over 100 years and has

Overview:

One of the most widely used Holley carbs of all times -the 0-80508S! Its dual feed fuel inlets assure you get all the fuel you need and its 750 CFM of airflow makes it the perfect performance upgrade carb. Its vacuum secondaries and electric choke make it super easy to use on a wide range of vehicles. Don't trust your performance to just anyone, Holley is the only modular carburetor company that has been in business for over 100 years and has powered every NASCAR champion since the 60's. Factory replacement emission legal carburetor. Please verify your make and model application on the chart available in the Tech Resources tab.
 

Features:

  • Vibratory polished for good looks
  • Performance upgrade for stock to mildly modified vehicles
  • Universal calibration for easy bolt-on performance
  • Factory preset electric choke for easy startups
  • Vacuum secondaries for use on wide variety of vehicles. Compensate for all vehicle weights, gearing & transmissions to allow smooth opening of secondaries.
  • Dual feed fuel inlets for constant high volume fuel delivery
  • Compatible with GM, Chrysler, and Ford A/T kickdown linkage. Additional parts may be required.
  • Power valve blow-out protection
  • 100% wet-flow tested by Holley technicians to assure it arrives ready to run!

 

Application:

Year Make Model Submodel Engine Size
1966 - 1969 Chevrolet Bel Air   427/7L V8
1966 - 1969 Chevrolet Biscayne   427/7L V8
1966 - 1969 Chevrolet Caprice   427/7L V8
1966 - 1969 Chevrolet Corvette   427/7L V8
1966 - 1969 Chevrolet Impala   427/7L V8
1966 - 1969 Plymouth Fury   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Plymouth Fury   383/6.3L V8
1967 - 1969 Plymouth Fury III   383/6.3L V8
1967 - 1969 Plymouth Satellite   383/6.3L V8
1967 - 1969 Plymouth Belvedere   383/6.3L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Fairlane   390/6.4L V8
1967 - 1969 Pontiac Bonneville   400/6.6L V8
1967 - 1969 Pontiac Catalina   400/6.6L V8
1967 - 1969 Pontiac Firebird   400/6.6L V8
1967 - 1969 Pontiac Grand Prix   400/6.6L V8
1967 - 1969 Pontiac GTO   400/6.6L V8
1967 - 1969 Pontiac Executive   400/6.6L V8
1967 - 1969 Buick Electra   430/7L V8
1967 - 1969 Buick Riviera   430/7L V8
1967 - 1969 Buick Wildcat   430/7L V8
1967 - 1969 Plymouth GTX   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Chrysler Town & Country   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Dodge Charger   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Dodge Coronet   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Dodge Monaco   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Chrysler Imperial   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Chrysler New Yorker   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Chrysler Newport   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Chrysler 300   440/7.2L V8
1967 - 1969 Dodge Polara   440/7.2L V8
1968 - 1969 Plymouth Fury I   383/6.3L V8
1968 - 1969 Plymouth Fury II   383/6.3L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranchero   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Torino   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Colony Park   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Comet   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Galaxie 500   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford LTD   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Mustang   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranch Wagon   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Country Sedan   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Country Squire   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Custom 500   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Marquis   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Montego   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Monterey   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Cougar   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Cyclone   390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1969 Pontiac LeMans   400/6.6L V8
1968 - 1969 Pontiac Tempest   400/6.6L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranchero   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Torino   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Galaxie 500   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford LTD   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Mustang   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranch Wagon   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Custom   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Country Sedan   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Country Squire   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Custom 500   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Fairlane   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Marquis   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Montego   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Monterey   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Cougar   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Mercury Cyclone   428/7L V8
1968 - 1969 Plymouth Fury I   440/7.2L V8
1968 - 1969 Plymouth Fury II   440/7.2L V8
1968 - 1969 Plymouth Fury III   440/7.2L V8
1968 - 1969 Oldsmobile 98   455/7.5L V8
1968 - 1969 Oldsmobile Delta 88   455/7.5L V8
1968 - 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado   455/7.5L V8
1968 Plymouth GTX   383/6.3L V8
1967 Plymouth VIP   383/6.3L V8
1967 Plymouth Belvedere II   383/6.3L V8
1968 Ford Thunderbird   390/6.4L V8
1968 Mercury Commuter   390/6.4L V8
1968 Ford Custom   390/6.4L V8
1968 Mercury Marauder   390/6.4L V8
1968 Mercury Park Lane   390/6.4L V8
1968 Mercury Montclair   390/6.4L V8
1969 Chevrolet C10 Pickup   396/6.5L V8
1969 Chevrolet C10 Suburban   396/6.5L V8
1969 Chevrolet El Camino   396/6.5L V8
1969 Chevrolet K10 Pickup   396/6.5L V8
1969 Chevrolet K10 Suburban   396/6.5L V8
1969 Chevrolet K20 Suburban   396/6.5L V8
1968 Ford Torino   427/7L V8
1968 Ford Galaxie 500   427/7L V8
1968 Ford Ranch Wagon   427/7L V8
1969 Chevrolet Brookwood   427/7L V8
1969 Chevrolet Kingswood   427/7L V8
1969 Chevrolet Townsman   427/7L V8
1968 Ford Custom   427/7L V8
1969 Chevrolet Estate   427/7L V8
1968 Ford Country Sedan   427/7L V8
1968 Ford Custom 500   427/7L V8
1969 Ford Fairlane   427/7L V8
1969 Ford Thunderbird   428/7L V8
1968 Mercury Colony Park   428/7L V8
1968 Mercury Comet   428/7L V8
1968 Mercury Commuter   428/7L V8
1968 Mercury Marauder   428/7L V8
1968 Mercury Park Lane   428/7L V8
1968 Mercury Montclair   428/7L V8
1969 Plymouth Road Runner   440/7.2L V8
1967 Plymouth Satellite   440/7.2L V8
1967 Plymouth VIP   440/7.2L V8
1967 Plymouth Belvedere II   440/7.2L V8
1967 Plymouth Belvedere   440/7.2L V8
1968 Oldsmobile 442   455/7.5L V8

 

Specs:

Barrels 4
Billet Color None
Booster Straight
Brand Holley
Carburetor Use Street
CFM 750
Choke Electric
Circuit 2
Condition New
Emission Code 2
Finish Shiny
Fuel Gasoline
Fuel Inlet Dual
Marine Use No
Material Aluminum
Model 4160
Primary Main Jet 72
Primary Power Valve 6.5
Primary Pump Nozzle Size 31
Product Type 4160 Model Carburetor
Secondaries Vacuum
Supercharged Application No
Throttle Bore 1.688 inch
Warning California Proposition 65
Warranty Limited 90 Day
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 13931266440

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
P
Verified Purchase
P. Meltzer
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
What is better? The overachieving 6 or underachieving 8?
Format: Hardcover
First, let me say that I thought that this was an excellent book and would recommend it to anyone who is at all interested in the college admissions process. Second, I was surprised at how many of the reviewers seemed shocked--shocked!--that applicants got bonus points for coming from minority backgrounds. Was this some kind of revelation? However one thing that surprised me a little bit is how--even moving beyond race entirely--the more advantages you have had in life, the more disadvantageous it will be for your admissions process. For example, I was unaware that having successful parents would be, in essence, held against you on the theory that more would be expected of you. While other reviewers have (jokingly?) said that they would advise their white kids not to check the "Caucasian" box, I might advise my (still very young) kids to say that their parents have been unemployed their whole life. I suppose that the main issue which this whole process really boils down to is the following: As a college applicant, is it more important to succeed in life relative to the world around you (i.e. relative to your classmates, to others of your race, to others of your geographical area, to your own parents' life and accomplishments, etc.) or is it more important to succeed absolutely and not on a relative scale. This book clearly informs us that the answer is the former and not the latter. Whether that should be the answer is another question. For example, say that a student's entire life could be distilled into 2 numbers each on a sliding scale from 1-10. The first number is simply your academic performance (grades, SAT's, course load, etc.) The second number is your background (race, economic circumstances, gender, etc.) In the case of Wesleyan, it seems clear to me that they would rather have a student whose first number was, say, a 6 if his or her second was a 2 (take Mig for example in Steinberg's book) than a student whose first number was an 8 if the second number was a 9 or 10 (take Tiffany Wang for example). Whether that is the right approach is certainly a legitimate issue for discusion and I'm not saying that it's not. I suppose that one of the things that would be interesting to know (even though one never really can know of course) is whether those numbers will change in the future. For example, if one were to know that Mig would always be a 6 and Tiffany would always be an 8, would that change the analysis as to which is the right approach? I suspect that part of the reason that a school like Wesleyan would favor the overachieving 6 over the underachieving 8 is due to the hope or expectation that those trends will continue in the future and that one day the 6 will actually be ahead of the 8. And maybe that's the way it works. Who knows.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2003
J
Verified Purchase
Jeremy W.
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
You will find out how a selective private college evaluate and admit students
Format: Paperback
I'm a high school counselor and college advisor. Fifteen years ago when I started my college counseling position, I struggled to understand or explain to students and their parents how a selective private college evaluate and admit students. It was this book that helped me understand the essence of selective private college admissions. Compared to other dry theory books, this book tells the admissions practice as stories that are easy to read, understand, and associate with. I highly recommend this book to students, parents, and new counselors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2024
M
Verified Purchase
M. Tucker
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 3
Who edited this mess?!?!?!?
Format: Kindle
This is a very interesting work of nonfiction. I found it intriguing and read it very quickly. I actually got invested in these students and their stories and their journey to get admitted to the college that was right for them. BUT, and this is a big but, this book is so poorly edited, it is disgraceful! If a person were reading this for research purposes, and it could be useful for just that, good luck to them. The dates are all over the place. At one point, the kids are being considered for the class of 2004, then it makes a reference to the current year as 2000, then it reverts back to 2004 for a long while, then it mentions how the kids--currently at their various chosen colleges--reacted to the events of 9/11/01. What the hell? It's very confusing. It makes it very difficult to keep things in context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2013
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Abundant information but needs update
Format: Kindle
I struggled a little when try to decide how many star to give. It's an excellent book and very informative. It feels like I was not reading a college admission advisory book, which very often are dry and mechanical. It feels like reading stories of students and AOs, I got attached and involved emotionally, and really felt for them. But there were abundant information in the book, I was able to use the book to answer most my questions. If you need a list of YESs, Nos, Warnings..., then this is not the book for you. If you need to know what happens during admission process, then this is an excellent book for you. Based on the information in this book, I was able to extract my own conclusions. The reason I hesitated if I should rate this book as a five stars book is how long ago it was written. A lot has changed. Many aspects stayed same, but many aspects changed. It will be misleading if this is the only guide book you are using. Wish everyone a great college application season.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 12, 2015
K
Verified Purchase
Kajetan
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 4
An intimidating read
Format: Paperback
This is a scary book to read if you are anyone, but most especially a Parent of a college bound junior or senior. The writer, Jacques Steinberg, a NY Times Reporter writes beautifully and captures the college application process in an authentic way, without overdramatization. His style and sensibility reminds me of Jon Kraukeur. I was prinicipally struck by the heroic Sisyphean efforts of the admissions office and the immense gap between public school and private school admissions counseling at the high school level, a gap which is even greater today. This is also a very good description of Wesleyan University -- what it is not so good at, and this is no fault of the author who tries to make this point and the related one that follows , but the best approach for the applicant is to find a college where he and she can thrive and trust the process, the admissions folks are very dedicated to bringing in students who can add value and to whom they can add value -- more to the point when a good fit is made, all the effort and anxiety is well worthwhile to the school and the applicant. good luck and best wishes to all of you who are college bound.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2012

recommand products