Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Klinch 52 inch Indoor/Outdoor Ceiling Fan with LED Light Kit - Matte WhiteFinish Matte White Blade Finish Matte White Motor Finish Method Type Painted Category Unipack Option Energy Efficient, LED, Outdoor Family Klinch 52 Voltage 120 V Shade Opal Frosted Number of Bulbs 1 Air Flow CFM 5429 Air Flow Efficiency 99 Blade Pitch 15 Bulb Type LED Module Canopy 8. 49 Dia Harmonized Codes 8414. 51. 3000 Kelvin 3000 Light Kit Included Yes Lumens Light Output 1600 Motor Size 172 x 17 Motor Type AC Ship Carton Height(in) 14. 84 Ship
| Finish | Matte White |
| Blade Finish | Matte White |
| Motor Finish Method Type | Painted |
| Category | Unipack |
| Option | Energy Efficient, LED, Outdoor |
| Family | Klinch 52 |
| Voltage | 120 V |
| Shade | Opal Frosted |
| Number of Bulbs | 1 |
| Air Flow CFM | 5429 |
| Air Flow Efficiency | 99 |
| Blade Pitch | 15 |
| Bulb Type | LED Module |
| Canopy | 8.49 Dia |
| Harmonized Codes | 8414.51.3000 |
| Kelvin | 3000 |
| Light Kit Included | Yes |
| Lumens / Light Output | 1600 |
| Motor Size | 172 x 17 |
| Motor Type | AC |
| Ship Carton Height(in) | 14.84 |
| Ship Carton Length(in) | 27.87 |
| Ship Carton Width(in) | 10.87 |
| Ship Weight(lbs) | 24.16 |
| Sold By | EA |
| Warranty | Limited Lifetime |
| Weight(lbs) | 19 |
| Airflow Efficiency Low | 172 |
| Airflow Efficiency Medium | 121 |
| Avg Airflow Efficiency | 102 |
| Avg CFM Energy | 3744 |
| Avg Energy Use | 37 |
| Avg Estimated Yearly Energy Cost | 10 |
| Avg Estimated Yearly Energy Cost on HIGH | 15 |
| Blade Finish Method | Painted |
| Blade Material | Composite |
| Blade Reversible | No |
| Blade Sweep | 52 |
| Bulb Base | Connector Pin |
| Bulb CRI | 90 |
| Cap Included | Yes |
| Carton Cubic Feet | 2.6 |
| Case Height(in) | 14.84 |
| Case Length(in) | 27.87 |
| Case Quantity | 1 |
| Case Weight Pounds(lbs) | 21.94 |
| Case Width(in) | 10.87 |
| CEC Uploaded | Yes |
| Ceiling To Blade Edge | 10.87 |
| Ceiling To Bottom (No Light Kit) | 8.85 |
| Ceiling To Bottom (With Light Kit) | 10.21 |
| CFM Low | 1834 |
| CFM Medium | 4019 |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Current Draw High | 0.46 |
| Current Draw Low | 0.27 |
| Current Draw Medium | 0.42 |
| DOE Classification | LSSD |
| DOE-FTC Uploaded | Yes |
| Energy Efficient | Yes |
| Exempt from DOE Procedure | No |
| Fan Energy Star 4 | No |
| Housing Diameter | 8.49 |
| Included Control | TR500 |
| Included Control Type | Handheld |
| Indoor | Yes |
| Leadwire | 11 |
| LED | Yes |
| Light Kit Energy Star 4 | No |
| Location Rating | Damp Rated |
| Max Wattage | 18 W |
| Motor Reversible | Yes |
| Number of Blades | 3 |
| Number Of Speeds | 3 |
| Outdoor | Yes |
| Prop 65 Description | This product can expose you to chemicals including Lead which are known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. for more information go to www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Regulated Product | Yes |
| Reverse Switch Location | Motor Housing |
| RPM High | 166 |
| RPM Low | 61 |
| RPM Medium | 122 |
| Safety Rating | UL Approved, cUL Approved |
| Voltage Cycles | 60 Hz |
| Watts High | 55 |
| Watts Low | 11 |
| Watts Medium | 33 |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 558 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Results!!
I have been using this product daily for just over two years. It’s one of those things that you just put into your daily routine and sort of forget about it.
I usually don’t expect to see a huge improvement with any product. I just use them hoping that I will maintain the status quo and that things won’t get too much worse. :)
This past Mother’s Day, I was with my sons and grandkids. I usually avoid letting them take my picture because these darn kids always seem to catch me with an unflattering look on my face. I’m pretty sure they do this on purpose. Anyway, I must not have had my guard up quite enough because when I got home, my phone alerted, and it was pictures, of me, taken incognito. 😎
I cautiously looked, and to my surprise I couldn’t believe how good the skin on my face looked!
I hurriedly scrolled back in my pictures on my phone to find a “before” picture from three years ago and I couldn’t believe my eyes. My skin looks so much better now than it did three years ago.
I wondered, how could this be? The only change that I made was adding this product to my routine a little over two years ago. There is an actual noticeable difference.
Now, I realize that my experience is nowhere near proof beyond all doubt, however, I’m not taking any chances. I will continue to use this product daily.
It’s relatively inexpensive and my results have been great.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Game changer!!
This stuff is amazing! I bought it because there was somewhat of a trend online saying glycolic acid is great for girls with sensitive skin. I’m inclined to agree because I have very dry, sensitive skin and this product works very well on my face and my legs (post shave). This is meant to lightly exfoliate the skin, so if you’ve just shaved your face or skin, a day later, this is great to put on to help prevent any irritation. Also, this is good for dry skin! When I have some dry patches on my face, I buff the dead skin off very gently but thoroughly. Then I use this toner to help prevent it from coming back. I was skeptical this would work because my skin is so extremely dry sometimes, but it really works! It was perfect for doing my makeup with. I use it every once in a while if I need any extra exfoliating. Do bear in mind, though, it smells really bad. I think it’s the witch hazel or something, but the product by itself smells quite gross. Definitely put lotion on a few minutes after it absorbs into the skin. This is a great product and I’m very happy with it. 10/10 when used wisely.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2025
★★★★★ 5
NOT a "dupe" but has the same results.
I am NOT saying this is a "dupe" or that they are the same in any way because they definitely have different ingredient profiles... so don't come for me... But what I will say is that if you like the first aid beauty radiance pads but don't like the price tag then this may be a cheaper option for you. This is my second bottle of this toner and 3rd tub of pads and for me personally they perform the same.
The Thayers is a little stronger of an exfoliant so if you have sensitive or dry skin do a patch test to see how your skin handles it.
I use it in the morning after I wash my face. It gives my skin a nice glow, removes dead skin and anything left over after washing my face and just like the radiance pads helps my makeup lay so much better. I have cotton tissues that are smooth on 1 side and textured on the other that I use instead of cotton rounds.
I pair it with the Thayers milky toner, maybe some other hydrating toners, a serum, a gel moisturizer and always SPF and even without makeup my skin looks amazing and healthy all day.
This is also a 12oz bottle and lasts a long time because you don't need to use a lot for it to do it's job.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Expensive
Works well but so does TN Dickinson’s at a better price.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 30, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good price
Great toner. Light weight and it has a good smell to it. Good price for the size.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026