Pay in installments of $745.60 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
HP Intel Xeon Gold (4th Gen) 6430 Dotriaconta-core (32 Core) 2.10 GHz Processor UpgradeHP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor Upgrade 32 Core, 64 Thread Powerhouse The HP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor Upgrade is a high performance upgrade designed for demanding enterprise workloads. Built on Intels 4th Gen Xeon Scalable architecture, this 32 core, 64 thread processor delivers exceptional throughput for virtualization, data analytics, database operations, and HPC tasks. Engineered for server class reliability and scalability, it leverages a
HP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor Upgrade – 32-Core, 64-Thread Powerhouse
The HP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor Upgrade is a high-performance upgrade designed for demanding enterprise workloads. Built on Intel’s 4th Gen Xeon Scalable architecture, this 32-core, 64-thread processor delivers exceptional throughput for virtualization, data analytics, database operations, and HPC tasks. Engineered for server-class reliability and scalability, it leverages a 10 nm process, large caches, and a power profile suited to modern data centers. If you’re upgrading an HP server to unlock higher parallel compute power, this upgrade is a compelling choice that balances raw performance with efficiency and reliability, enabling your infrastructure to handle modern workloads with confidence.
- Unmatched multi-core performance: With 32 cores and 64 threads, this Xeon Gold upgrade accelerates virtualization, containerized deployments, and parallelized workloads, delivering higher throughput for enterprise apps and cloud-native architectures.
- Advanced caching for data-intensive tasks: Featuring a substantial cache hierarchy (60 MB L3 and 64 MB L2), it minimizes memory bottlenecks, speeds up large-scale analytics, and improves hit rates for database operations and in-memory workloads.
- Efficient 10 nm process with high core density: The 10 nm lithography paired with a robust turbo capability enables strong single-thread performance when needed while preserving energy efficiency across sustained loads.
- Server-grade compatibility: Designed for the LGA-4677 socket, this upgrade targets HP servers and other motherboards that support 4th Gen Xeon configurations, helping you extend the life of your data-center hardware without a full platform replacement.
- Enterprise-grade reliability for mission-critical workloads: Built to operate in demanding environments, this processor is crafted to support long uptimes, industrious workloads, and scalable performance as your business grows, with robust 64-bit processing to power modern software ecosystems.
Technical Details of HP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor Upgrade
- Model: Intel Xeon Gold (4th Gen) 6430
- Core Count: 32 cores
- Thread Count: 64 threads
- Base Clock: 2.10 GHz
- Maximum Turbo Clock: 3.40 GHz
- Cache: 60 MB L3 cache; 64 MB L2 cache
- Lithography: 10 nm
- Socket: LGA-4677
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 270 W
- Integrated Graphics: No graphics
- 64-bit Processing: Yes
- Package/Type: Processor Upgrade
How to install HP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor Upgrade
- Prepare your workstation: Verify that your HP server board supports the LGA-4677 socket and 4th Gen Xeon features. Check the latest BIOS or firmware updates from HP and Intel, ensuring compatibility with Xeon Gold 6430 and the OS you plan to run.
- Power down and unplug: Safely shut down the server, disconnect power, and discharge any residual static electricity. Move to a static-safe workspace before handling the processor and motherboard.
- Remove the existing processor cooler and heatsink: If upgrading within an existing system, carefully detach the cooling assembly and any mounting hardware. Clean the old thermal interface material from the processor and heatsink surfaces if applicable.
- Install the new processor: Align the processor with the LGA-4677 socket using the guiding notches and pin layout. Gently place the CPU into the socket, ensuring proper seating without forcing alignment. Secure any retention mechanisms per your motherboard’s instructions.
- Apply thermal interface material and reattach cooling: Apply a thin, even layer of thermal paste on the CPU surface (as recommended by the cooler manufacturer) and mount the heatsink/cooling solution securely. Reconnect all power and data cables associated with the CPU cooler.
- Enter BIOS and configure: Power on and enter the system BIOS. Update microcode if prompted, enable required virtualization features, set memory profiles (e.g., ECC and XMP profiles if supported), and verify CPU recognition and power/thermal limits. Save changes and boot into the operating system.
- Perform post-install validation: Run stability and stress tests appropriate for server workloads (e.g., memory tests, CPU burn-in, and workload simulations) to confirm proper operation. Monitor temperatures and power consumption to ensure the cooling solution is adequate and the system remains within spec.
Frequently asked questions
- Q: Is the HP Intel Xeon Gold 6430 compatible with my HP server motherboard? A: Compatibility requires a motherboard with an LGA-4677 socket and support for 4th-Gen Xeon processors. Always consult your server’s maintenance guide or HP’s compatibility list to confirm support for the 6430 and the BIOS version required for optimal operation.
- Q: Does this processor include integrated graphics? A: No. This Xeon Gold upgrade is designed for headless server use and relies on discrete graphics if required by your workload, or can run headless for compute tasks and virtualization.
- Q: What workloads benefit most from this upgrade? A: Virtualization platforms, large-scale databases, data analytics, HPC simulations, and cloud-native workloads that demand high parallel processing power and robust multi-thread performance.
- Q: What is the maximum turbo frequency? A: The processor features a maximum turbo clock of up to 3.40 GHz, enabling higher clock speeds on single-core tasks when thermal and power budgets permit.
- Q: What is the memory and cooling expectation for this upgrade? A: Memory compatibility and performance depend on the server’s memory subsystem and BIOS; ensure adequate cooling to support the 270 W TDP and follow HP’s recommended cooling configuration to maintain stability under load.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame.
What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools
He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible.
Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur.
Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life.
The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian.
Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith.
You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error.
BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
★★★★★ 5
Good experience
Format: Paperback
It was all good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Love the Edition and Footnotes; Don't need the Cultural Criticisms
Format: Paperback
The layout of the book and the footnotes are each great. What mars the book, unfortunately, is the editor's need to make simplistic statements about cultural elements. Several times, for example, he addresses "feminism," even using the term "Franken-feminists" in a puerile manner at one point. As too many of these conservative Catholics do, he simplifies and comments about modern culture without nuance. In this case, it is simply unprofessional and inaccurate (i) to not capture the myriad differences in feminist thought (many of which he and his readers would accept) and (ii) thereby to make all feminists the same (e.g,, assuming the feminists of the 1970's are the same as today's.) This is all unfortunate because when he is just addressing the literary elements of the book, his comments are wonderful and helpful to the reader.
Any reader should know that this presentation will be tilted in an unsophisticated and simplistic way toward a traditional Catholic view (a view that can indeed be defended well while still being careful and charitable to critics). With that caveat, he (or she) should still buy it and garner a good edition of the text.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024