Pay in installments of $8.09 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 14 - Aug 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Fiat Doblo 263 (2011 - 2022) Lower Rear Engine Mount Insert PFF1-1120Fiat Doblo 263 (2011 2022) Lower Rear Engine Mount Insert PFF1 1120 For C510. 5 and C514 gearboxes only. For models with TCT gearbox, use PFF80 1120. This part is inserted into the original bush, to increase stiffness. If fitting this to the Diesel or TwinAir engine vehicles, an increase in noise and vibration is to be expected. This should be considered as a performance upgrade. Road Series insert increases stiffness at 1mm by 113%, at 2mm by 173%
Fiat Doblo 263 (2011 - 2022) Lower Rear Engine Mount Insert - PFF1-1120 For C510.5 and C514 gearboxes only. For models with TCT gearbox, use PFF80-1120. This part is inserted into the original bush, to increase stiffness. If fitting this to the Diesel or TwinAir engine vehicles, an increase in noise and vibration is to be expected. This should be considered as a performance upgrade. Road Series insert increases stiffness at 1mm by 113%, at 2mm by 173% and at 3mm by 225% Black Series insert increases stiffness at 1mm by 143%, at 2mm by 219% and at 3mm by 280% - NOTE: Price is for CAR KIT, NOT per bush… Powerflex price their bushes individually, but we have combined the quantities to make it simple!Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
My remote caddy
Color: Black, Size: Small
I have so many gadgets that uses remotes, my end table looked awful with remotes everywhere and when I would move something, a remote would fall off the table. It was aggravating but now I have a nice caddy to sit on my table and it holds all of my remotes. It's beautifully designed and was shipped to me very quickly. I think it was in my mailbox within 24 hours. I'm very pleased with the item and the person I purchased it from was quick to get it to me. Thank you.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Sleek and spacious
Color: Black, Size: Small
Perfect for those who have multiple remotes and need a single place to stow them away. Material is leather like, firm and has a texture design. It suits well on a countertop or end table. It is not petite.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Color: Black, Size: Small
This is great to store multiple remotes in a small footprint clearing up table room. My 6 year old Grandson loves it also keeping remotes in one area. He operates the TV also. We loved it so much we bought a second for another room.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for me.
Color: Black, Size: Small
I was a little trepidatious before opening it all up and checking out the holder. I didn't know whether or not the larger remotes I had would fit. How would it work for the bulky / longer TV and Universal Remotes. It worked perfectly.
The holder is small enough to use on a small side table next to the couch. And it's very simple to access. The living room now looks like a living room...rather than Radio Shack gone biserk.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Very good quality.
Color: Black, Size: Small
So nice to have for keeping my stuff organized. Easier to keep track of my remotes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2026