Pay in installments of $15.50 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 16 - Aug 21
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Brembo 02-04 Mercedes-Benz C32 AMG/98-00 C43 AMG Rear Premium UV Coated OE Equivalent RotorBrembo's UV Coated rotors are developed as direct replacement that meets or exceeds OEM specifications. Environmentally friendly, the solvent free UV coating offers superior protection of the disc, including braking plate surfaces. High Carbon cast iron, where applicable, minimizes noise and vibration and provides maximum performance and enhanced driving comfort. Included with the UV Coated rotors is a fixing screw kit with all the necessary hardware
Brembo's UV Coated rotors are developed as direct replacement that meets or exceeds OEM specifications. Environmentally friendly, the solvent free UV coating offers superior protection of the disc, including braking plate surfaces. High Carbon cast iron, where applicable, minimizes noise and vibration and provides maximum performance and enhanced driving comfort. Included with the UV Coated rotors is a fixing screw kit with all the necessary hardware for simple and worry free installation. New intelligent marking location show part number & the minimum thickness. In order to optimize and restore braking performance rotors and pads should be replaced together. Pair your UV Coated rotor with Brembo's NAO/Ceramic or Low Met brake pad formulations. Brembo, the most trusted brand in braking.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Tiny Cheap Toy
Style: Coconut Tree, Style: Coconut Tree
It is way smaller than advertised and is maybe worth $0.50 cents. Only appropriate for toy breeds who do NOT chew.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2024
★★★★★ 1
TINY!!!
Style: Coco-Nut, Style: Coco-Nut
This toy is about 3 inches. My dogs would eat it in one bit. It got returned.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2022
★★★★★ 2
Tiny for a dog toy.
Style: Coconut Tree, Style: Coconut Tree
Much smaller than ad images would lead you to believe. I honestly thought the package was empty.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Corgi Approved
Size: 12"
These "Giggler" toys are great. Not meant for the dog who likes to really "kill" it's toys as they're mostly just soft fabric. My Corgi pup is pretty gentle so far and she proudly struts around the house with this toy all day long. It's her favorite thing to play with. The rope legs are good for tug-o-war with the Heeler. The squeaker isn't annoying, either. It only makes noise when the toy is moved in a back and forth type motion.
The only downside is not being able to choose the one you want. I was lucky...ordered 2 and got the frog and alligator, which are the two I wanted.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2017
★★★★★ 5
My Chuiweenie loves these.
Size: 12", Size: 12"
My aunt bought the original one for one of my other furbabies and she didn’t care much for it. We got a new puppy and this has become her favorite. We have bought a second. She loved the “giggle” sound and goes crazy when she hears it. Only downside is the plush face has a thin material that is easy for them to chew through. Also, with Amazon you may get an alligator instead of a frog lol.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 28, 2023