SKU: 2065109831

2 Pcs Rear Brake Pad FA208 for KTM Motorcycle EXC SX EGS SC SX MX SMC MXC SXC

Sale price$29.58 Regular price$32.87
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $8.22 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

2 Pcs Rear Brake Pad FA208 for KTM Motorcycle EXC SX EGS SC SX MX SMC MXC SXC2 Pcs Rear Brake Pad FA208 for KTM Motorcycle EXC SX EGS SC SX MX SMC MXC SXC Replace Part Number: FA208, B13150006 Application: Fit for following models: KTM: 1998 1999 KTM 200 EGS 1998 2003 KTM 200 EXC 1994 2002 KTM 250 SX 1994 1998 KTM 300 EGS 1994 2003 KTM 300 EXC 1994 2003 KTM 300 MXC 1994 1996 KTM 300 SX 1994 1995 KTM 350 LC4 1996 KTM 350 SX 1996 1997 KTM 360 SX 1998 2002 KTM 380 EXC 1998 2002 KTM 380 SX 1995 KTM 400 Duke 1994 KTM 400 Duke 1996

2 Pcs Rear Brake Pad FA208 for KTM Motorcycle EXC SX EGS SC SX MX SMC MXC SXC

Replace Part Number: FA208, B13150006

Application:
Fit for following models:
KTM:
1998-1999 KTM 200 EGS
1998-2003 KTM 200 EXC
1994-2002 KTM 250 SX
1994-1998 KTM 300 EGS
1994-2003 KTM 300 EXC
1994-2003 KTM 300 MXC
1994-1996 KTM 300 SX
1994-1995 KTM 350 LC4
1996 KTM 350 SX
1996-1997 KTM 360 SX
1998-2002 KTM 380 EXC
1998-2002 KTM 380 SX
1995 KTM 400 Duke
1994 KTM 400 Duke
1996-1997 KTM 400 EGS
2001-2002 KTM 400 EXC
2002 KTM 400 EXC Racing
2001 KTM 400 EXC Racing
1999 KTM 400 LC4
1998 KTM 400 LC4
2001 KTM 400 LC4 Dual
2000 KTM 400 LC4 Dual
1998 KTM 400 LSE
1997 KTM 400 LSE
1996-1999 KTM 400 SC
2000-2002 KTM 400 SX
1994-1995 KTM 440 EXC
2003 KTM 450 EXC
2001-2002 KTM 520 EXC
2001-2002 KTM 520 SX
2003-2004 KTM 525 EXC
2003-2004 KTM 525 EXC Racing
2003-2004 KTM 525 MXC
2003 KTM 525 MXC Racing
1995 KTM 550 MXC
1994-1998 KTM 620 Duke
1995-1997 KTM 620 EGS
1997 KTM 620 EGS-E
1995 KTM 620 EXC
1996-2000 KTM 620 SC
2000 KTM 620 Supermoto
1996-1999 KTM 620 SX
2005 KTM 625 SMC
2003-2004 KTM 625 SXC
2003-2005 KTM 660 SMC
2004 KTM 660 SMC Supermoto
2008 KTM 690 Enduro
2011-2013 KTM 690 Enduro R
2008-2011 KTM 690 SMC
2007 KTM 690 Supermoto
Yamaha:
TT 600 R (5CH1/5CH2/5CH3) 1997-2002
TT 600 RE (5CH5) 2004
TT 600 E (4LW3/4LW4/4GV4/4GV5) 1994-2001
TT 600 K From 4GV 003404 (Brembo rear caliper) 1995-1996
XT 660 Z Tenere 2008-2013
ALFER:
VRE 125 4T 1998-
Divertida 250 Super Motard 2001-
Diferente Enduro 2001-
VR 250 1998-2013
APRILIA:
650 ie 2001-2004
BX Cross (449cc) 2007-2012
BX Enduro (505cc) 2008-2012
BX 570 Motard 2008-2010
CCM:
404 E 2003-2004
404 DS 2003-2004
404 DS Supermoto 2003-2004
404 DS Supermoto 2007-2008
404 DS Trail 2007-2008
CMX?450 (MX) 2008
450 FS Trail 2007-2008
644 DS Supermoto 2004
644 DS 2004
R 30 (Spoke & Mag) 2002-2004
R 35/R35S 2006-2008
FT?35 S (400cc) (DRZ 400 Motor) 2007-2008
R?45 2007-2008
FT?650 2008
FT 710 S Flat Tracker 2008
FACTORY:YR 250 2003
CCM:
604E Dual Sport/Supermoto/RS 1998-2003
604E R30 2002-2004
GAS GAS:
EC 125/250/300/200 Enduro 1997-1999
Enforcer four 400/501/600 2 Quad 1999
Enduros 125/250 2000
HIGHLAND:
950 V2 Outback 2000-2004
950 V2 Motard 2000-2004
HRD:GS 50

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 2065109831

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
C. Witt
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 4
Heavy Duty Paper Towel Holder
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel, Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
Nice looking, heavy duty paper towel holder. Looks like it'll be durable. The top did have a couple of dark, tarnished looking spots but it's not too noticeable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2023
H
Verified Purchase
Hunter Hart
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Free Mini-Screwdriver + microfiber cloth? Thank you
Color: Gold, Material Type: Stainless Steel
100% worth the purchase mainly for the little screwdriver (a real one, just small) and microfiber cloth included. As long as you install it correctly it all holds together very well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Connie
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
I love it. It holds the jumbo rolls and that makes it a perfect kitchennitem
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Douglas
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
The Best Book on the Creation-Evolution Debate
Format: Paperback
“The book The Evolution of Adam is an accessible study of the hermeneutical issues involved in reading Genesis and Paul on Adam in view of evolution.” - Peter Enns In my opinion The Evolution of Adam by Peter Enns is the best book available on the evolution versus creation debate because it goes right to the heart of the matter. Christians grossly misunderstand the creation stories in Genesis because they read them from a modern point of view. The first part of the book deals with Adam in Genesis. The second part of the book deals with Paul's Adam in Romans. The book is short and very well written for the popular audience. PART 1 ADAM IN GENESIS Many stories in the Old Testament have parallels with other Ancient Near Eastern stories. The Adam story is no different as it has strong similarities to Atrahasis. If I may quote Enns, “Israel's creation story was written to say something about their place in the world and the God they worshiped. To think that the Israelites, alone among all other ancient peoples, were interested in (or capable of) giving some definitive, quasi-scientific, account of human origins is an absurd logic. And to read the story of Adam and Eve as if it were set up to so such a thing is simply wrongheaded. It strains credulity to think that, of all the ancient peoples with origins stories, Israel alone escaped this story-telling mentality and gave us something approximating 'history' or 'science' in the modern sense.” The Evolution of Adam shows conclusively that, “the Adam story in Genesis is part of Israel’s literature of national and religious self-definition, not the origin of humanity.” The Adam story is not concerned with human origins as most Christians assume. Adam is Israel. Israel’s history as a nation can be broken down as follows:   1. Israel is “created” by God at the exodus through a cosmic battle (gods are defeated and the Red Sea is “divided”);   2. The Israelites are given Canaan to inhabit, a lush land flowing with milk and honey;   3. They remain in the land as long as they obey the Mosaic law;   4. They persist in a pattern of disobedience and are exiled to Babylon. Israel’s history parallels Adam’s drama in Genesis:   1. Adam is created in Genesis 2 after the taming of chaos in Genesis 1;   2. Adam is placed in a lush garden;   3. Law (not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil) is given as a stipulation for remaining in the garden;   4. Adam and Eve disobey and are exiled. PART 2 PAUL'S ADAM Paul’s use of the Adam story, like Paul’s other uses of the Old Testament, is marked by creativity and the prior conviction that Jesus is God’s unexpected solution to a universal plight. Enns' summary of Paul's Adam in Romans 5:12-21 is as follows: 1. Adam is hardly mentioned in the Old Testament. 2. Some see Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David as “new Adams.” Paul represents Jesus as a new Adam. 3. The Fall of man is not taught in the Old Testament. 4. The Fall of man is not taught in the Garden scene. The imputation of Adam’s sin is not taught in the garden story. 5. The Adam/Jesus Parallel in Romans 5 is both clear and not so clear. What does Paul mean when he says that through Adam’s sin, “death came to all, because all sinned.” One might have expected Paul to say, “because Adam sinned” (death is Adam’s fault). 6. Paul’s Jesus/Adam parallel does not stem from a “plain reading” of Genesis. It is selective and theologically driven. The Book of Romans is not about personal salvation, but about the Jew/Gentile relationship. 7. Paul was an ancient man and he had an ancient view of human origins. 8. Paul used the Old Testament in creative ways that violate the grammatical-historical-contextual approach. So he could be doing the same with Adam. 9. Adam was used creatively in Second Temple Jewish literature (Paul’s contemporaries). CONCLUSION Evolution and creation are not in conflict because the early chapters of Genesis have nothing to do with HOW God created the world or the first humans. Therefore science can be studied freely for what it is and the Old Testament can be understood as ancient Israel's story. If I may quote Enns again, “The root of the conflict over evolution and creation for many Christians is not scientific or even theological, but group identity and fear of losing what it offers. The challenge of evolution is here to stay, and its effect on how Christians read Genesis and Paul must be addressed deliberately.” “Evangelicals tend to focus on how to protect the Bible against the attacks of evolution. The real challenge before them is to reorient their expectation of what the story of Adam and Eve is actually prepared to deliver.” If you are looking to solve the evolution-creation debate in your mind then the Evolution of Adam is the book to read. Evolution and creation are both true. God created through evolution. The Bible is not a modern science book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2012
W
Verified Purchase
William M. Victor
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
Thoughtful book on the purpose of the Creation accounts
Format: Paperback
This book provides a very good introduction into how the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was most likely formed. It takes very seriously the environment that may have shaped the Pentateuch. It also provides a good primer into how Paul read the Hebrew Bible: through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. If the reader of the Bible understands the purpose behind the creation narratives then there appears to be less conflict with scientific explanations for the origins of the universe and even humanity. I was expecting this book to do something that Enns never claims he was setting out to do, that is give an alternative understanding of the origins of sin and death while taking Paul's account in Romans 5 seriously. Enns claims that Paul interpreted the Adam story in a way that he interpreted other accounts of the Hebrew Bible, through a Christological lens but with little regard to historical context. To Enns, Paul was a man of his time and just because Paul, a man uninformed by scientific explanations of the universe, understood Adam as a historical person doesn't mean those of us who are informed need to see it the same way. Enns values Paul's Christocentric lens on the Hebrew Bible, but comes just short of calling Paul wrong on his understanding of the origin of sin and death. If you are working through the issue of integration/synthesizing scientific thoughts on the origins of the universe and humanity (as well as trying to come to grips with the purpose of the Creation accounts in Genesis) this book will serve you well. If you are expecting Enns to provide that integration/synthesis for you, you will be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2012

recommand products