Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
sl04170 d pp inaTechnische Basisdaten Abdichtung: 2L LS seal at Both Sides Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0858791500000 ueres Breitenma: 80 mm Abdichtung: Doppelte Lippendichtung Fasenueres Breitenma: 1,8 mm Fasenwinkel: 30 Gewicht: 8794 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Nutueres Breitenma: 5,2 mm Nutdurchmesser: 226 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 230,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl fr SchmierstoffLubrikation: (n G Fett) "790. 0000"
Technische Basisdaten
| Abdichtung: 2L - LS-seal at Both Sides |
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0858791500000 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 80 mm |
| Abdichtung: Doppelte Lippendichtung |
| FasenÄußeres Breitenmaß: 1,8 mm |
| Fasenwinkel: 30 ° |
| Gewicht: 8794 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| NutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 5,2 mm |
| Nutdurchmesser: 226 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 230,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl für SchmierstoffLubrikation: (n G Fett) "790.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 80,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(b) mm 80,00 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 9.3 |
| Innenmaße: mm 170,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| PP Lip Seals On Both Sides Of The Bearing |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 490000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 1030000 |
| -0,2 mm Abstand Sprengring unteres Abmaß |
| 0 mm Abstand Ringnuten unteres Abmaß |
| 0 mm Abstand Sprengring oberes Abmaß |
| 0,2 mm Abstand Ringnuten oberes Abmaß |
| 30 ° Fasenwinkel |
| Abstand Ringnuten oberes Abmaß: 0,2 mm |
| Abstand Ringnuten unteres Abmaß: 0 mm |
| Abstand Ringnuten: 71,2 mm |
| Abstand Sprengring oberes Abmaß: 0 mm |
| Abstand Sprengring unteres Abmaß: -0,2 mm |
| Abstand der Wälzkörper: 64 mm |
| B 80 mm Äußeres Breitenmaße: |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 80 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 1.030.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C 1 71,2 mm Abstand Ringnuten |
| C r 490.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 129.000 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 1 226 mm Nutdurchmesser |
| Dichtring-Ø (am Bord): 206 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 490.000 N |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 129.000 N |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 194 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,6 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 1.030.000 N |
| T max 80 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| X 64 mm Abstand der Wälzkörper |
| d =1 min 194 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =2 206 mm Dichtring-Ø (am Bord) |
| m 5,2 mm NutÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| r a max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| t 1,8 mm FasenÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| ≈m 8,764 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 1402 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good, inexpensive replacement filter
I've used these filters for a couple years (four replacements) on my Subaru Crosstrek, and they seem to do the job well, probably as well as the original. I generally remove and clean them every three months, and replace them every six.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Save some money by doing your own cabin filter change! (You won't notice a difference).
So, one day I was getting an oil change at the dealership, and the associate told me that cabin filter was pretty dirty, which I believed because of the places I take the car, and she said that they could change it while they were finishing up the rest of their inspection, since they already had it apart. I asked her "How much?", and then we both had a laugh when she said "$90." I told her I'd take care of it.
It took two days for Amazon to get a replacement filter to me, twenty minutes to watch a You Tube video showing how to replace the cabin filter on my car (I watched it twice), and then about twenty-five minutes to replace the filter itself--I keep a messy glove compartment, so a good portion of the time was loading and unloading that nightmare.
In the end, under $15 for the filter, maybe 45 minutes to watch and replace, and the cabin filter hasn't been this good since I first bought the car.
This replacement version was as good as the OE filter, fit exactly the same, there's no difference in airflow that I can tell, and so far (6 months later), it seems to be holding up pretty well. We'll see what it is like after a year. I did get the oil changed about a week ago, and the technician didn't raise any alarms about the filter, so everything seems to be working.
$90 for a new filter? You can do it yourself cheaper.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Fresh Air Upgrade for My 2024 Impreza
Installed this in my 2024 Subaru Impreza, and it fit perfectly—no issues. The air smells noticeably cleaner now, and it took less than 10 minutes to swap out. The carbon and HEPA filtration does a great job clearing out odors, dust, and pollen—definitely an upgrade over the factory filter.
The build feels sturdier than the OEM version, though it does have slightly fewer pleats. Might mean it needs replacing a bit sooner, but for the price and performance, I’m fine with that tradeoff.
If you’re looking for a quick, affordable way to improve your cabin air, this one’s a solid pick.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 26, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Well built, good fit.
I like it so well, I just bought two more to keep on the shelf for when the price doubles. Seems better built than oem, but I don't know how you can judge the filtration; seems good though.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Perfect fit for 21 Cross Trek
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2026