SKU: 46090078672

Frisse Honing Deal – Citroenhoning, Fruithoning & Oranjebloesemhoning 250g

Sale price$17.01 Regular price$18.90
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Frisse Honing Deal – Citroenhoning, Fruithoning & Oranjebloesemhoning 250gFrisse Honing Deal Citroenhoning, Fruithoning & Oranjebloesemhoning 250g Een zonnige voordeelbundel met drie frisse honingsoorten in potten van 250 gram. Deze honing deal combineert citroenhoning, fruithoning en oranjebloesemhoning: drie zachte, lichte en fruitige honingsoorten met elk een eigen bloemige herkomst. Perfect voor wie houdt van toegankelijke honing met een frisse, verfijnde smaak. Frisse honing voordeelpak in het kort Deze voordeelbundel

Frisse Honing Deal – Citroenhoning, Fruithoning & Oranjebloesemhoning 250g

Een zonnige voordeelbundel met drie frisse honingsoorten in potten van 250 gram. Deze honing deal combineert citroenhoning, fruithoning en oranjebloesemhoning: drie zachte, lichte en fruitige honingsoorten met elk een eigen bloemige herkomst. Perfect voor wie houdt van toegankelijke honing met een frisse, verfijnde smaak. 🍋🍯🍊

Frisse honing voordeelpak in het kort

Deze voordeelbundel bestaat uit drie glazen potten van 250 gram. Samen vormen ze een lichte en fruitige honingproeverij met smaken uit citrusbloesem, fruitboomgaarden en sinaasappelbloesem.

  • Citroenhoning 250g: friszoet, licht van kleur en subtiel citrusachtig.
  • Fruithoning 250g: zacht, mild en afkomstig uit Nederlandse fruitboomgaarden.
  • Oranjebloesemhoning 250g: goudkleurig, bloemig en zacht fruitig van smaak.

In totaal ontvangt u 750 gram honing. Een heerlijke bundel voor thee, yoghurt, brood, desserts, fruit, ontbijtgerechten en zomerse recepten. 🌼

Wat zit er in deze Frisse Honing Deal?

Deze pakketdeal is samengesteld voor liefhebbers van zachte, lichte en fruitige honing. U ontvangt drie verschillende honingsoorten, elk verpakt in een glazen pot van 250 gram. Door de combinatie van citrusbloesem, fruitbloesem en sinaasappelbloesem ontstaat een mooie proeverij met frisse en bloemige smaaktonen.

1. Citroenhoning 250g – fris, zacht en citrusachtig

Citroenhoning is een lichte bloemenhoning afkomstig van citrusbloesem. De honing heeft een zachte, friszoete smaak met een subtiel citrusachtig aroma. Hoewel de naam aan citroen doet denken, is de honing niet zuur. Juist de zachte zoetheid en lichte frisheid maken deze honing populair bij liefhebbers van verfijnde smaken.

Citroenhoning is heerlijk in thee, door yoghurt of kwark, op brood, bij desserts, over fruit of als smaakmaker in een frisse dressing. Voeg honing bij voorkeur toe aan thee wanneer de drank iets is afgekoeld, zodat het aroma mooi behouden blijft.

2. Fruithoning 250g – licht en fruitig uit Nederlandse boomgaarden

Fruithoning is een lichte honing afkomstig uit Nederlandse fruitboomgaarden. Tijdens de bloei van appel-, peren-, kersen- en pruimenbomen verzamelen bijen nectar van verschillende fruitbloesems. Dat geeft fruithoning een zachte, verfijnde smaak met een subtiele fruitige toon.

Door het milde karakter is fruithoning een fijne honing voor dagelijks gebruik. Hij past goed bij ontbijtgerechten, yoghurt, muesli, havermout, thee, desserts en vers fruit. Ook bij lichte kazen of in een frisse dressing komt deze honing mooi tot zijn recht.

3. Oranjebloesemhoning 250g – bloemig en zacht fruitig

Oranjebloesemhoning is een heldere, goudkleurige honing met een zacht en fruitig aroma. De nectar wordt verzameld uit de witte bloesems van sinaasappelbomen in mediterrane bloesemgaarden. Dit geeft de honing een lichte, bloemige geur en een toegankelijke smaak.

Oranjebloesemhoning is veelzijdig in de keuken. Gebruik deze honing over pannenkoeken, door yoghurt, in thee, bij granola, in smoothies, over fruit of bij lichte desserts. Door de zachte smaak is hij geschikt voor jong en oud.

Smaakprofiel: drie frisse honingsoorten naast elkaar

Deze bundel draait om lichte, fruitige en bloemige smaken. De drie honingsoorten zijn toegankelijk, maar hebben elk een eigen karakter:

  • Citroenhoning: licht, friszoet en subtiel citrusachtig.
  • Fruithoning: mild, zacht en verfijnd fruitig.
  • Oranjebloesemhoning: bloemig, goudkleurig en zacht aromatisch.

Zo krijgt u in één pakket een frisse honingproeverij die perfect past bij ontbijt, thee, yoghurt, fruit en lichte gerechten. Deze deal is ideaal voor iedereen die graag zachte honingsoorten vergelijkt zonder direct voor zware of kruidige honing te kiezen.

Hoe gebruik je deze frisse honing deal?

Omdat deze bundel drie lichte smaakprofielen bevat, kunt u eenvoudig variëren. Elke pot bevat 250 gram honing, een praktisch formaat om meerdere soorten naast elkaar te gebruiken.

Bij ontbijt en lunch

Gebruik citroenhoning op toast, beschuit of door yoghurt. Fruithoning past goed bij muesli, havermout en ontbijtgerechten met vers fruit. Oranjebloesemhoning is heerlijk op brood, pannenkoeken, wafels of crackers.

In thee en warme dranken

Citroenhoning geeft thee een frisse, zachte toets. Fruithoning combineert goed met lichte groene thee of kruidenthee. Oranjebloesemhoning past mooi bij thee, warme melk of een zachte kruidendrank. Voeg honing toe wanneer de drank iets is afgekoeld.

Bij desserts, fruit en yoghurt

Deze drie honingsoorten zijn zeer geschikt bij desserts. Denk aan yoghurt met fruit, panna cotta, granola, ijs, gebakken appel, fruitsalade of een lichte cake. De frisse en bloemige smaken geven gerechten een verfijnde zoete afronding.

In dressings, marinades en sauzen

Citroenhoning past goed in frisse dressings met citroen, mosterd of olijfolie. Fruithoning is lekker in lichte sauzen en marinades. Oranjebloesemhoning geeft mediterrane gerechten, salades en desserts een zachte bloemige toets.

Voor wie is dit honingpakket geschikt?

Deze Frisse Honing Deal is ideaal voor:

  • Liefhebbers van lichte, zachte en fruitige honingsoorten.
  • Mensen die graag verschillende honingsoorten willen proeven.
  • Gezinnen die toegankelijke honing voor dagelijks gebruik zoeken.
  • Thuiskoks die honing gebruiken in ontbijt, desserts, dressings en sauzen.
  • Klanten die graag 3 x 250 gram honing in één voordeelbundel bestellen.
  • Iedereen die een vrolijk honing cadeau zoekt. 🎁

Wilt u meer smaken ontdekken? Bekijk dan ook onze collectie rauwe honing van de imker of ontdek andere vloeibare honingsoorten.

Bijenkennis: bloesemhoning en fruitige honing

De smaak van honing wordt bepaald door de nectar die bijen verzamelen. Bij citroenhoning en oranjebloesemhoning komt die nectar uit citrusbloesem: de geurende bloesems van citroen- en sinaasappelbomen. Dat geeft deze honingsoorten hun frisse, bloemige en subtiel fruitige karakter.

Fruithoning heeft een andere herkomst. Deze honing ontstaat wanneer bijen nectar verzamelen in fruitboomgaarden, bijvoorbeeld van appel-, peren-, kersen- en pruimenbloesem. Daardoor krijgt fruithoning een lichte en verfijnde smaak.

Deze bundel brengt drie zachte bloesemsmaken samen: citrusachtig, fruitig en bloemig. Een mooie proeverij voor iedereen die honing graag op een frisse manier gebruikt. 🍊🐝

Bewaren en gebruikstips

Bewaar de potten honing op kamertemperatuur, droog en donker. Sluit de pot na gebruik goed af om geur, smaak en structuur mooi te behouden. Zet honing liever niet in de koelkast, omdat dit de structuur kan beïnvloeden.

Honing kan na verloop van tijd kristalliseren. Dit is een normaal proces. Wilt u de honing weer iets vloeibaarder maken? Plaats de gesloten pot dan voorzichtig in een kom met handwarm water.

Waarom kiezen voor deze Frisse Honing Deal?

  • Drie frisse honingsoorten in één voordeelbundel.
  • Elke honing wordt geleverd in een glazen pot van 250 gram.
  • Met citroenhoning, fruithoning en oranjebloesemhoning.
  • Mooie mix van fris, fruitig, bloemig en zacht.
  • Veelzijdig te gebruiken bij thee, ontbijt, yoghurt, fruit, desserts en gerechten.
  • Leuk als cadeau of proeverij voor honingliefhebbers. 🍯

Veelgestelde vragen over deze Frisse Honing Deal

Welke honingsoorten zitten er in dit pakket?

Dit pakket bevat drie potten honing van 250 gram: citroenhoning, fruithoning en oranjebloesemhoning.

Hoeveel honing ontvang ik in totaal?

U ontvangt 3 potten van 250 gram. In totaal bevat deze voordeelbundel dus 750 gram honing.

Smaakt citroenhoning zuur?

Nee, citroenhoning is niet zuur. De honing heeft een zachte, frisse en licht citrusachtige smaak.

Hoe smaakt deze honing deal?

De bundel combineert drie frisse smaken: citroenhoning is friszoet en citrusachtig, fruithoning is mild en fruitig, en oranjebloesemhoning is zacht bloemig met een subtiel fruitig aroma.

Is dit honingpakket geschikt als cadeau?

Ja, door de drie verschillende smaken en het handzame formaat van 250 gram per pot is dit pakket zeer geschikt als cadeau of proeverij.

Waarvoor kan ik deze honing gebruiken?

Gebruik de honing in thee, yoghurt, ontbijtgerechten, desserts, smoothies, dressings, bij fruit of gewoon op brood.

Kan deze honing kristalliseren?

Ja, honing kan na verloop van tijd kristalliseren. Dit is normaal. Door de gesloten pot voorzichtig in handwarm water te plaatsen, kan de honing weer iets vloeibaarder worden.

Waarom kiezen voor producten van Lekkerhoning?

Bij Lekkerhoning vindt u een breed assortiment honingsoorten voor echte smaakliefhebbers. Wij selecteren honing met aandacht voor herkomst, smaak en ambacht, zodat u eenvoudig de honing kiest die past bij uw keuken en genietmoment. 🐝

  • Ruime keuze uit bijzondere honingsoorten.
  • Altijd aandacht voor smaak, kwaliteit en ambacht.
  • Snelle verzending binnen 48 uur.
  • Gratis bezorging vanaf €70 in Nederland en België.
  • Leuke voordeelbundels en honingpakketten om nieuwe smaken te ontdekken.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 46090078672

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 1746 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jonathan Bailey
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Required Reading for Egyptologists
Format: Paperback
To say the very least, this book is an enlightening read. The author attempts to design a new chronology of Egypt based on a number of archaeological observations he made which pointed to certain anomolies in the standard chronology of the Third Intermediate Period of Egyptian history. The TIP is one of those points in history where information is scanty and there is much room for error in interpreting existing archaeological evidence. Rohl posits that the 21st and 22nd pharaonic dynasties were at least partly contemprary in a period of balkanization of Egypt, contrary to the conventional chronology's view that they were successive. He therefore shifts the entire preceding dynastic histories downward from 200 to 300 years. That is, what we previously though to occur at 1250 BC actually happened at 1000 BC according to Rohl. In so doing Rohl has done much to synchronize Egyptian chronology with the chronology of the bible. Rohl claims that the Amarna letters were not to be compared to Joshua's conquest of Canaan, a period where they clearly do not fit, but rather tell the tale of Saul's and David's claiming of Israel from Phillistine Egyptian vassals. He synchonizes Ramesses II's conquests of Asia Minor with the biblical invasion of Shishak. Also, he identifies the Egyptian 'Hyksos' with the Amalekites of the book of Exodus. There are many other enlightening points of connection with the bible that Rohl makes, but my point here is not to explain them all. The true value of this book for any egyptologist, student of biblical history, or any student of the ancient world at all, is this book's popular presentation of the field of archaeology and ancient history. So rare are books that actually connect a lay reader with the methodologies and evidence upon which researchers base their works. In order to show a need for a revision of Egyptian chronology, Rohl shows how the entirety of Egyptian chronology depends on all but of a handful of archaeological finds, many of them of dubious reliability. Even if Rohl's opponents find more pieces of evidence supporting the standard chronology, the number will still be very small and they will quite likely be as subject to interpretation, as are the ones that Rohl has pointed out. Rohl goes to great lengths to show the history of the observations that scholarship has made, thereby showing us where they may have gone wrong. (As a popular book, I must confess that parts of Rohl's historical narratives depict events in which one expects to find Indiana Jones) Next, when building his own chronology, Rohl puts us close to the texts and archaeological evidence upon which he bases his theories. Rohl's conclusions are in many cases impressive, but in some cases I had to shake my head and come to the conclusion that he was grasping at straws. For instance, I believe that his work in astronomical retrocalulations to find the dates of eclipses recorded in ancient texts is pretty shaky. I even doubt that the text that he is talking about is even mentioning an eclipse. This information has proved to be incredibly valuable to me, however, as I now know that astronomy based chronology, something I though would give absolute and undisputable dates, is as foggy an area of research as any. I do not know if I will eventually embrace Rohl's ideas or not, or if partially. I do know that reading this book has shown me the types of reasoning and observations that old world historians make, and can now make an informed decision about how firm our grip on dating events of the past is. My conclusion: if somebody tells you some biblical event did not happen because the dates don't line up with scientific knowledge, don't be disheartened. We have a LONG way to go before we can truly be confident about such statements, if indeed we will ever arrive at that sort of knowledge. This uncertainty that I have gained from Rohl's book is corroberated by the "Oxford History of Ancient Egypt" which provides wonderful information on Egyptian chronology. Everyone who wants to study ancient history, whether it be Egyptian, biblical, Middle Eastern, or even Chinese for that matter, should read this book, so the next time they read somewhere that 'such and such happened at 3200 BC', they will know to take that statement with a grain of salt. Whether Rohl is right or not, I am forever indebted to him for showing me how chronologists operate. Lastly, I would like to say, after all this talk about archaeology and methodology of Egyptologists, that this book is very readable and comprehensible to the lay reader. Though a smattering of knowledge of biblical and/or Egyptian history will make the book more interesting to the reader, no such knowledge is required in order to understand the book or find value in it. It is truly a popular book intended for the average interested person. I recommend it to all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2001
S
Verified Purchase
Stone Dog
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization. The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more. David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt. When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters. This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground. I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed. This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Great book. Not an easy read but worth going ...
Format: Hardcover
Wish I had known about this book when it was published! Great book. Not an easy read but worth going thru more than once with great info. I have long held the belief of the early exodus date due to the Great Pyramid dating. Have read in many books about the confusion of the Egyptian chronology but this is the first one I've seen that really opens it up for examination.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2016
P
Verified Purchase
PhiloX
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
A Lost Book doesn't Make Up for Lost Time
Format: Paperback
I bought the hard back copy of this book years ago & what an interesting read with great time lines & beautiful color photos. Someone borrowed the book & I forgot who I loaned it to. After years of trying to remember where it went, I at last bought it again as a paper back through Amazon.com. It's a used book with no marks & only a slight indentation on a few pages on the side. Now that I am looking into it & remembering it once again, I am over loaded with too many historical theories. Maybe it's my fault for being a book reader rather than an Egyptologist. I am going to write down some simple time frame theories & you will see what this book is about: General View: The Hebrews came into Egypt through reuniting Joseph & his brothers. They experienced the Amarna period of primitive Monotheism. Akhenaton was over thrown & polytheism was reinstated as the Hebrews were enslaved. Moses came during Rameses II & the Exodus was during the last years of Rameses II or the Pharaoh Marneptah. Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC Rameses II 1279-1213 BC Exodus last years of Rameses II or Marneptah. Problems: Biblical History is off by 180 years if counted back from the creation of Solomon's temple. Rameses II was a great conquer, & both he & his son Marneptah never wrote of 10 plagues or an Exodus. Both died as old men & their mummys are still with us. David Rohl's Theory: revised Egyptian history by shortening the 3rd Intermediate Period by almost 300 years. Tutimaios known as Dudimose is the Pharaoh of the Exodus Exodus 1447 BC Amarna period of Akhenaton = time of King David approx. 1000 BC. Proof: letters written between an Egyptian Pharaoh & King of Israel during that period. Rameses II = Shishak of 921 BC sack of Jerusalem. Proof: Rameses II used a monogram that comes close to Shishak. Problems: goes against establish Egyptian time frames or "If the Bible doesn't fit the Egyptian time frames then make the Egyptian time frames fit the Bible". Akhenaton is no longer the 1st political monotheist & seems out of place not influencing Moses & writing letters to King David. From Another Book I Read - "Akhenaton & Moses" by Ahmed Osman Ahmed Osman's Theory: Akhenaton is the same person as Moses Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC Exodus after the overthrow of Akhenaton by Rameses I Problems: Moses doesn't die overlooking the Promise land of Canaan as stated in Deuteronomy 34 but dies without a known grave as did Akhenaton. Moses monotheism doesn't deal with a solar disc as a symbol of the one God or a replacement of a lesser Egyptian God, but is from an inherited convent. Other Dates of the Exodus: Josephus 1552 BC Sedar Olam Rabbah 1440 BC Book of Jubilees 2410 BC Early Church Fathers 1570 to 1320 BC I need to research Immanuel Velikovsky ideas on this subject matter. I just bought the book & will review it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2013
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Correcting the Biblical Chronology
Format: Hardcover
When I first begin my study of the Bible, I had purchased another book on archaeology and the first thing I realized is that nothing fit. The time of Solomon was impoverishment in Israel. When you read the Bible Solomon was the richest king ever. David Rohl's book Pharaohs and Kings changed all that. He persuasively shows where the chronology is wrong and when corrected things fall into place. What is commonly called the old testament comes to life. It is the greatest book on Biblical Archaeology ever written. Thank you David !!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019

recommand products