SKU: 89906600041

Caravan - If I Could Do It All Over Again, I'd Do It All Over You (LP, Album, RP)

Sale price$84.59 Regular price$93.99
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $23.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 11 - Aug 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Caravan - If I Could Do It All Over Again, I'd Do It All Over You (LP, Album, RP)Media Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+) Sleeve Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+) Comments: smal sticker with name of previous owner on one side of label and on the back ( should be removable) vinyl is nice General notes about this release (please note: our version may differ a little. see the comments above): Early pressing (pre June 1972) label variant, with the second 'SKL R 5052' catalog number, dark blue boxed Decca labels and ' 1970' at the bottom of

Media Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+)
Sleeve Condition: Very Good Plus (VG+)

Comments:
smal sticker with name of previous owner on one side of label and on the back ( should be removable) vinyl is nice

General notes about this release (please note: our version may differ a little. see the comments above):
Early pressing (pre-June 1972) label variant, with the second 'SKL-R 5052' catalog number, dark blue boxed Decca labels and '℗ 1970' at the bottom of the labels. This version: '℗ 1970' at the bottom of the labels under the group's name; '-2W/-4W' matrices in the deadwax; On side one only, 'Aristocrat Music' has an indented 'Music' and {ZAL.9752P matrix is centred above catalogue number. There is no space before the 'P' in the {ZAL.9752P matrices on either label. Released in a front-laminated single sleeve. First catalog number on sleeve, second on labels. Sleeve printed in England by Robert Stace. Laminated with ‘Clarifoil’ made by British Celanese Limited. © 1970 The Decca Record Company Limited, London. – – – – – – – – This record was never published with 'unboxed' Decca labels. Decca had the publishing year at the bottom of the boxed labels from 1969 to 1972. It was moved to the right side of the label, by the catalogue number, around June 1972. Blue-label UK Decca release variants currently in the database: First Press Variants – SKL 5052 cat. no., -2W/-4W matrices, '℗ 1970' at label bottom: • 7763537 Title misprinted 'If I Had To Do It...' on rear & spine • 5894729 Correct titles on rear & spine Pre-June 1972 Represses – SKL-R 5052 cat. no., -2W/-4W matrices, '℗ 1970' at label bottom: • 5492127 Same label typography as 1st press except for '-R' cat. no. • [This Sub Side 1 'Aristocrat Music' has indented 'Music', {ZAL.9752P} shifts left; from now on no space before 'P' in ZAL matrices • 14814255 Side 1 'Aristocrat Music' left-justified, on Side 2 it's right-justified; {ZAL.9752P} permanently shifts to right on both sides Circa 1972 Transitional Issues – SKL-R 5052 cat. no.: • 6849593 '℗ 1970' at bottom on Side 1, but centre-right on Side 2; both sides 'Aristocrat Music' right-justified; '-2W/-4W' matrices • 11708432 '℗ 1970' centre-right on Side 1, at bottom on Side 2; both sides 'Aristocrat Music' right-justified; new '-3W/-5W' matrices Post-June 1972 Represses – SKL-R 5052 cat. no., '℗ 1970' centre-right: • 502118; 'Aristocrat Music' left-justified again but shifted down; no known matrix suffix • 12565829 'Aristocrat Music' now on one line; no {brackets} around ZAL matrix; no known matrix suffix Later Reissue Labels – SKL-R 5052 cat. no.: • 3837291 and 4096660 have the same blue Decca label design but fonts have been modernized; song titles rearranged and no longer stacked one-to-a-line; '-3W/-5W' matrices on 3837291

 

A1. If I Could Do It All Over Again, I'd Do It All Over You
A2a. And I Wish I Were Stoned
A2b. Don't Worry
A3. As I Feel I Die
A4a. With An Ear To The Ground You Can Make It
A4b. Martinian
A4c. Only Cox
A4d. Reprise
B1. Hello Hello
B2. Asforteri 25
B3a. Can't Be Long Now
B3b. Françoise
B3c. For Richard
B3d. Warlock
B4. Limits

 

Barcode and Other Identifiers:

Matrix / Runout ZAL.9752P
Matrix / Runout ZAL.9753P
Matrix / Runout ZAL-9752.P-2W
Matrix / Runout ZAL-9753-P-4W

 

Printed By Robert Stace
Copyright (c) The Decca Record Company Limited
Published By Aristocrat Music
Lacquer Cut At Decca Studios
Pressed By Decca Record Co. Ltd., Pressing Plant, UK.

Data provided by Discogs
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 89906600041

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Autumm Caines
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Easy setup works well
Color: Black, Size: 28-70"W x 48-120"H (Pack of 1)
I love these! Have bought two so far. Easy set up and no damage to walls. Room divider or window curtains. Works great!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Madison R.
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Best no-show socks ever!
Size: 6-10, Color: Black
If you're tired of wearing socks that slip off and show in your sneakers, then you need to try these amazing socks! They are designed to stay in place, even after being active all day. They are incredibly soft and comfortable, and they are truly no-show, so you won't see them at all. I've been using these socks for years and have never had any issues. In fact, I love them so much that I've bought multiple packs, and my family members have started using them too. Don't waste any more time with those annoying socks that slip off and show - give these a try and you won't be disappointed!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2024
K
Verified Purchase
Krissy
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
The best
Size: 9-11, Color: Black
Seriously the best non slip low cut socks you can find. They stay in place all day and I love the fabric. They are thin which I prefer. These are really the only socks I wear.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Cassie Huerta
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Great socks for the price!
Size: 6-10, Color: Black, Size: 6-10, Color: Black
I love these socks, they are perfect no shows but the material is thick enough for toes not too go thru. The grip is perfect and keeps the sock in place all day. I would definitely order true to size as the fit was perfect. I was surprised to find these socks at the price I did, especially when I got the socks in both black and white.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2025
K
Verified Purchase
Kayla
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Best non-slip no show sock!
Size: 6-10, Color: Black
I love these socks! I wear them mostly with my slip on vans. The are thin so your feet can breathe (I hate thick socks). They have a grip on the heal so that they don't slip off of your feet, and it actually works! My only negative about these socks would be that if you have bigger than a size 8 foot, I would not purchase them because they do run a bit small. I wear a size 7 and they fit perfectly! They do look very tiny upon unpacking, but they stretch to the according size. I would also recommend letting them air dry after washing them and not putting them in the dryer. The first pair I purchased, I made the mistake of drying them and they shrank to an unbelievably small size. I've had my second set of socks for over 4 months now and have not had any problems since Ive been air drying them. I have not encountered any problems with them tearing as other have stated. Even though these are thin socks, they seem to be made quite well in my opinion.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2022

recommand products