SKU: 50980729525

Artiss Standing Desk Adjustable Height Desk Dual Motor Electric Grey Frame Oak Desk Top 140cm

Sale price$175.50 Regular price$195.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $48.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Artiss Standing Desk Adjustable Height Desk Dual Motor Electric Grey Frame Oak Desk Top 140cmIs your posture getting you down? Now you have the choice of working while sitting or standing with our Artiss Roskos III Motorised Adjustable Desk. With the standing desk, you can choose to sit when necessary or stand when you feel like stretching your muscles, and you can do it all without leaving work. The desk frame has an easy to use control panel with three custom pre sets and a sit stand reminder system, as well as smooth dual motors that allow

Is your posture getting you down? Now you have the choice of working while sitting or standing with our Artiss Roskos III Motorised Adjustable Desk. With the standing desk, you can choose to sit when necessary or stand when you feel like stretching your muscles, and you can do it all without leaving work. The desk frame has an easy-to-use control panel with three custom pre-sets and a sit/stand reminder system, as well as smooth dual motors that allow for ultra-quiet operation and low energy consumption. Other notable features include a high-quality powder-coated frame for easy cleaning and maintenance, height-adjustable rubber footings for extra stability, and a max load of 100kg so you’ll be able to fit all your desktop essentials. Work smart, stay healthy and combat lethargy at work with the motorised adjustable desk.

Features
Motorised height-adjustable frame:
Dual motors
High quality powder coated metal frame and components
Digital control panel
3 custom pre-sets
Sit/stand reminder system
Adjustable rubber footings
Smooth and ultra-quiet operation
Adjustable frame length
Compatible with 120cm-180cm length and 60cm-80cm width desktops
Easy set-up

Desktop:
Contemporary design
Eco-friendly material
Anti-scratch finish
Rounded corners
Smooth edges
Made to match
Pre-drilled holes

*Note: There are no pre-drilled holes for control panel, you could select the location for installation according to your own needs.

Specifications:
Motorised height-adjustable frame
Brand: Artiss
Generation: Roskos III
Input voltage: 240V/50Hz
Power plug: Australian standard
Max speed: 32mm/s
Max. load: 100kg
Minimum height: 69cm
Maximum height: 118cm
Adjustable frame length: 110cm to 170cm
Frame width: 58cm
Foot length: 68cm
Compatible desktop length: 120cm to 180cm
Compatible desktop width: 60cm to 80cm
Control panel cable length: 1.45m
Adaptor cable length: 3m
Frame colour: Grey

Desktop
Material: Particle board
Dimensions: 140cm x 70cm
Thickness: 2.5cm
Colour: Oak
Assembly required: Yes
Number of packages: 2

Package Content
Artiss Motorised Adjustable Desk Frame x 1
Desktop x 1
Assembly Manual x 1

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 50980729525

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S. Langley
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025

recommand products