SKU: 75473572987

【USA輸入】ヴィンテージ SARAH COV. メープルリーフ イヤリング/Vintage SARAH COV. Maple Leaf Clip On Earrings

Sale price$35.96 Regular price$39.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $9.99 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 20 - Jul 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

【USA輸入】ヴィンテージ SARAH COV. メープルリーフ イヤリング/Vintage SARAH COV. Maple Leaf Clip On Earrings1960SARAH COVENTRY SARAH COVENTRY() 1949NY()1981 SARAH COV.>> 1960 H 3. 7cm x W 3. 7cm ()5g SAC(SARAH ANN COVENTRY)

1960年代のSARAH COVENTRYのメープルリーフイヤリング。葉脈のテクスチャーが描かれたシャンパンゴールドのメタルで、カエデの葉が精巧に表現されています。まるで本物の葉がメタルになったかのような質感と陰影が素敵。葉には切り込みが施されており、二枚の葉が重なっているように見えるユニークなデザインです。身に纏えば、美しい光沢とシルエットで横顔を印象的に魅せてくれるお品。

良好なヴィンテージコンディションです。

【SARAH COVENTRY(サラ・コベントリー)とは】
1949年にNYで創業したコスチュームジュエリーメーカー。社名は創業者の孫娘(サラ)の名をとって名付けられました。主にホームパーティー形式で販売され、大きな成功を収めました。個性的なものからエレガントなものまで、豊富なデザインが特徴。1981年に閉業しましたが、そのデザイン性と品質の高さから、現在も世界中のコレクターに愛されています。

SARAH COV.ジュエリー一覧はこちら>>

※当店で扱っている商品は、ヴィンテージのアイテムです。目立つ傷や汚れは記載しておりますが、状態の良いお品でも、経年に伴う小傷や汚れ等がある場合がございます。新品とは異なるヴィンテージ特有の風合いとして、ご理解頂けますようお願い申し上げます。

ヴィンテージ・コスチュームジュエリー
年代:1960年代
サイズ:H 約3.7cm x W 
約3.7cm
素材:メタル
重さ(片耳):5g

刻印:SAC(SARAH ANN COVENTRY)
輸入元:アメリカ

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 75473572987

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Annie Love
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 3
Not the Same 🤍
Size: Size 2 (184 Count)
I loved the Mama Bear size 1 diapers, so I expected the “plush” size 2s to be the same. Unfortunately, they feel completely different. These seem thinner and not quite as absorbent as the size 1 regular pack. The design is also really busy, which makes the wetness indicator harder to see at a quick glance. With babies, that little line matters more than you’d think. I’ll still finish the pack, but I’m not sure I’d repurchase this “plush” version. If you’re choosing between them, I’d recommend sticking with the regular pack instead. In comparison, Huggies still perform better than these for us. 🤍✨ They don’t hold blowouts at all but they do fit well. They’re also not stretchy. I noticed the print on my baby’s legs.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gabriela V Joshi
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Great cost efficient option
Size: Size 4 (36 Count)
I switched over from Millie Moon and really like these. They’re affordable, don’t have harmful additives, and are soft and gentle on my babies. Holds a significant amount and doesn’t leak even on overnight wears. I like the simple non character design as well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Savanna
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 2
Every other diaper leaked
Size: Size 7 (92 Count)
I bought these diapers because they were the cheapest available to buy with a gift card my family was given. Normally I use the bulk store brands. The diapers were very hit and miss. It varies from diaper to diaper even in a pack. My son does urinate heavily but even before he would get anywhere near a “full” diaper it would leak! Leading to wet pants and messes. We’ve never had this problem with other diaper brands. Even our cloth diapers hold better than half of these did. For note he falls below the max size for these diapers by at least 5 lbs. I don’t plan on repurchasing these because of the leaking issue. Beyond that they were easy to use like any other diaper, didn’t cause diaper rash, held together, but was subpar in absorption.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jacqueline Bullion
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Smells great
Great smells amazing
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Badica
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice smell
This has a nice scent, works well, and did not cause an allergic reaction.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 23, 2026

recommand products