Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
SIMARI Winter Gloves Women Men Ski Snow Gloves Liner Thermal Warm Touch Screen, Suit for Running, Cycling, Biking, Hiking, Driving, Walking, Typing, Freezer Work, Sports, Soccer, Shooting, Gaming 102Brand: SIMARI Color: Black Features: Touch Screen DesignWith the Unique and Sensitive touchscreen Fingers Capability, the SIMARI touch screen gloves are compatible with iPhone, iPad, computer and other intelligent equipment. You can freely texting, typing, play games, click smart watch and GPS panel of cars with the SIMARI phone gloves. Comfortable & WarmThe SIMARI winter gloves are made of 95% Polyester and 5% Spandex, with the warm Flannel lining
Brand: SIMARI
Color: Black
Features:
- 【Touch Screen Design】With the Unique and Sensitive touchscreen Fingers Capability, the SIMARI touch screen gloves are compatible with iPhone, iPad, computer and other intelligent equipment. You can freely texting, typing, play games, click smart watch and GPS panel of cars with the SIMARI phone gloves.
- 【Comfortable & Warm】The SIMARI winter gloves are made of 95% Polyester and 5% Spandex, with the warm Flannel lining and elastic cuff, enhancing the warmth and elasticity. When you go out, the SIMARI warm gloves can keep your hand warm and comfortable in cold weather.
- 【No-slip & Humanized Design】Coming with enough silicone particles on the palm and fingers, which effectively increases the grip strength and abrasion resistance of the thermal gloves. Let you grip any tool firmly. And there are reflection patterns on the back of the gloves.It can reflect light and improve the safety of cycling at night.
- 【The Scope Application】The SIMARI Winter Gloves will be a great and practical gift for men, women, family or friends. The men women gloves is perfect for cycling, running, driving, motorcycling, walking, riding, hiking, climbing, golfing, fishing, shooting, workout, training, working, football, soccer, baseball, sports outside or stay at home in winter, spring or fall.
- 【Warm Tips】Scan with the Transparency app or Amazon app to learn more details. You have no risk to have a try, just need to believe, we will be always with you. Any question, we are willing to try our best to solve it, without any requirement. If all customers are satisfied with our product, it will be our greatest achievement.
Binding: Apparel
model number: 102
Part Number: US102106-BBLACK-L
Details: SIMARI Winter 手套 SIMARI冬季手套已經升級。 不同於其他普通手套，SIMARI 冬季手套由雙層複合棉製成，更溫暖舒適。 SIMARI手套有很多人性化的設計，以改善經驗的使用。 我們相信您一定會喜歡這款產品！ 人性化設計 ☆加厚睡 ☆觸控螢幕 ☆防滑硅 ☆反光圖案 ☆防風 選擇指南 (1)測量手掌周長； (2)將您的手尺寸與SIMARI手套數據進行比較； (3) 選擇最接近的尺寸。 手圍 M：7.50-8.30 英吋 L：8.30-9.09 英吋 XL：9.09-9.88 英吋 清潔技巧 (1)首選手洗。 你只需要用肥皁浸泡手套，然後擦洗，在陰涼處乾燥。 (2)如果用機器清洗，最好將手套放入洗衣袋，以減少變形的可能性。 （3）切勿使用熱水、漂白劑等強酸洗，不曬太陽，因爲材料組織會很容易被破壞，從而導致毛球、織物鬆散和手套變形等。
EAN: 0787446914312
Package Dimensions: 10.0 x 8.6 x 0.6 inches
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 1860 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written.
Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier.
My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author.
Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing.
And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot...
In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Wonderful and useful book.
Format: Kindle
I am very glad I purchased this book. I used it over and over again. Wrote many notes and it added much value to pursue my cases at courts. This is a true asset for providing an overall overview with much advice.
I also purchased his other book The Winning Brief, but that is only available in paper format and it is mainly for linguistic help in writing briefs for appellate court, for the purpose of really perfecting your writing. At lower courts or supreme courts you just do not have the time to think in that much details and these courts may not even read it. You are lucky if you can say two sentences on court appearances. They do not put that much into details when making judgments, so most likely your case ends up in the appellate, and here that book becomes valuable too - The Winning Brief.
Again, this book really excellent and pleasant to read. The Kindle version was easy to search for anything, word, phrase, notes.
5 star book. THANKS.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2018