SKU: 48649884433

高效偷懶:『世界一流工程師』都在用的AI時代思考法

Sale price$107.10 Regular price$119.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $29.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 15 - Aug 20

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

高效偷懶:『世界一流工程師』都在用的AI時代思考法: : Microsoft Be Lazy Fail Fast 20 80 Azure FunctionsAI ADHD 44 Be LazyFail Fast180 & X100100 208020%80% X XAI AI X X X X X X X 1971 Azure Functions SIerIT2009DevOps20152019Azure Functions ITIT

作者: 牛尾剛 | 譯者: 陳聖傑


      
美國微軟Microsoft高級軟體工程師教你
Be Lazy 只做最重要的事→→讓工作更輕鬆
Fail Fast 正確犯錯→→更早下班!

找出工作中20%的核心任務,
花更少的時間,解決80%的問題!

  ★先思考,再行動,選對方向才能事半功倍
  ★微軟Azure Functions雲端團隊「成為AI時代高薪人才的思考方法」!
  ★重點不是「你做了多少事」,而是「你的工作帶給公司多大影響力」

  ▋進不了矽谷夢幻科技公司,也能學習高薪工程師的高效工作術!
  作者現任美國微軟高級軟體工程師,身居全球一流雲端團隊的重要角色,但他其實曾經是三流的工程師,不僅笨拙、記憶力差,還診斷出成人ADHD(注意力不足過動症),在轉職到美國高科技企業的路上挫折不斷。

  因此,他不斷研究「如何提高效率完成自己不擅長的事」,並奇蹟地在44歲進入微軟!不僅獲得更高的年薪,也過上了自己理想中的生活。他從小在日本長大,沒有接受國外教育,在本書中,他用亞洲人的視角,學習、模仿美國同事的思維模式,寫出了自己在超大型雲端開發前線學到的超高效工作法!

  其中,最讓作者印象深刻的兩大工作原則:「Be Lazy」(偷懶的智慧!)、「Fail Fast」(快速失敗,找對方向!)更是180度扭轉了他的工作哲學;透過傳達這些新的思維,他已幫助眾多讀者更接近自己的夢想!

  ▋你是否也困擾於……
  →為什麼同樣的問題反覆發生,沒有徹底解決?
  →為什麼老闆&主管總是對我的報告不耐煩?
  →為什麼升遷速度那麼慢?
  →世界級的企業和人才,具備哪些了不起的思考方式和高效工作法?
  →我的工作能力還有哪裡需要加強?

  【翻轉工作思維▶工作效率X3、休息時間X3】
  X普通上班族:如果有100個任務,就做完100個任務。
  ✓超高效工程師:只做20個核心任務,剩下的80個不做,明白「20%的工作能創作80%價值」。

  X普通上班族:出問題時「盲目試錯」,一一檢查所有可能出錯的地方。
  ✓超高效工程師:「先建立假設→再試錯」,在三次以內找到問題點。

  X普通上班族:工作能夠「被AI取代」。
  ✓超高效工程師:運用AI「創造新的事物」。

  X普通上班族:視多工為「高效的工作法」。
  ✓超高效工程師:視多工為「生產力的殺手」。

  X普通上班族:「害怕失敗」,做完所有細節才敢推出服務或成果,結果發現不符合市場需求。
  ✓超高效工程師:「對失敗不陌生」,崇尚『敏捷式開發』➡快速驗證、快速失敗,快速摸清市場需求。

  X普通上班族:「大概懂了就可以」,結果每次做一樣的事情,都要花時間重新研究做法。
  ✓超高效工程師:「花時間理解原理和細節」,學會就能快速應用。

  X普通上班族:「憑感覺」判斷問題。
  ✓超高效工程師:「憑事實+數據」判斷問題。

  X普通上班族:重點放在「投入更多時間和努力」,一直在加班。
  ✓超高效工程師:重點放在「提升產出和生產力」,只投入達成目標所需的最低限度努力。

  X普通上班族:開會完還「把一大堆問題帶回座位」。
  ✓超高效工程師:「不把工作帶回座位」,在會議現場解決問題。

  X普通上班族:從「自己的角度」解決問題,耗費大量時間來回溝通。
  ✓超高效工程師:從「提問者的角度」解決問題,迅速釐清問題重點。

  ……超過50個「高效掌握工作與人生」的最強技能!超容易執行!
  
作者

牛尾剛

  1971年出生於日本大阪府,畢業於關西大學。

  現任美國微軟Azure Functions產品團隊高級軟體工程師,居住於西雅圖。

  大學畢業後在日本大型系統整合公司(SIer)擔任IT工程師,並於2009年自主創業。作為敏捷式開發與DevOps領域的專業顧問,他參與了大量的顧問服務與公開演講。2015年加入美國微軟,擔任技術推廣者,2019年起在美國微軟總部負責Azure Functions開發工作。

  著作包括《IT工程師從零開始學英語的祕訣》(書名暫譯,ITエンジニアのゼロから始める英語勉強法)。

譯者    

陳聖傑

  曾為華語教學工作者。目前旅居於日本鎌倉,一邊以文字及影像紀錄著日常的吉光片羽,一邊朝著純熟編譯者的方向邁進。
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 48649884433

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
B
Verified Purchase
BF J.V.
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Economical and descent for price
Color: Carbonized, Size: 3-piece, Color: Carbonized, Size: 3-piece
Pleased with price, style, color, and the 3 sizes of these carbonized bamboo cutting boards. Based on the reviews had the expectation of the "smell", which is the oil used to seal the cutting boards. (I suspect linseed oil was used based on the lingering smell, as the off-gasing process is longer. It's also cheaper than Tung oil and food grade mineral oil.) I work with wood and various oil sealants so the smell is a non-issue. As there are natural ways to speed that process up and minimize the smell. In addition, I will be using fractionated coconut oil or food grade mineral oil to seal cutting boards on a regularly basis (monthly or more frequent). As we live in a dry climate, hard water, and frequent use. Appreciate the other reviews which lead to our purchase and reasonable expectation of these cutting boards.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
briana canterino
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 4
Good but wood smell
Color: Carbonized, Size: 3-piece
These came with a woodsy smell but the price was great for the quality
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
Robert Kiehn
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
The Best Apologetics Book I've Ever Read!
This is one of the best apologetics books I've ever read!! Greg Koukl, President of Stand To Reason at str.org has written a great and informative book that is very thought provoking and often points out atheist contradictions and logical fallacies not to mention how lackluster and ignorant atheist thinking is. Here is a good review of it: [..] "Discerning Reader Editorial Review Reviewed 02/17/2009 by Tim Challies. Recommended. A valuable tool to assist Christians in sharing and defending the faith. I have a bit of an aversion to books on apologetics. I don't know exactly why this is, but it may be that many of them seem to teach methods of defending the faith that either manipulate or bludgeon. Somehow grace and apologetics do not seem to go together as they ought. So it was with perhaps just a bit of reluctance that I began reading Gregory Koukl's Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions. This is a book that promises to teach a new method, a respectful method, of defending the faith and of attempting to convince others of the truth of Christianity. This is not an apologetics 101 text, as in a book that will compare and contrast various apologetic methods; instead, it is a guide, a book that seeks to lead the reader into a new method of sharing his faith with others. "If you're like a lot of people who pick up a book like this, you would like to make a difference for the kingdom, but you are not sure how to begin. I want to give you a game plan, a strategy to get involved in a way you never thought you could, yet with a tremendous margin of safety." Here is what Koukl promises--he sets no small goal. "I am going to teach you how to navigate in conversations so that you stay in control--in a good way--even though your knowledge is limited. You may know nothing about answering challenges people raise against what you believe. You may even be a brand new Christian. It doesn't matter. I am going to introduce you to a handful of effective maneuvers--I call them tactics--that will help you stay in control." This tactical approach is a useful one, for it allows you to stay "in the driver's seat in conversations, so you can productively direct the discussion, exposing faulty thinking and suggesting more fruitful alternatives along the way." It is important to note that "tactics are not manipulative tricks or slice ruses. They are not clever ploys to embarrass other people and force them to submit to your point of view. They are not meant to belittle or humiliate those who disagree so you can gain notches in your spiritual belt." Instead, they are ways of guiding a conversation to expose poor reasoning and then use that as a bridge to the truth. Koukl begins by looking at three basics skills the Christian will need if he wishes to be an effective apologist. First, he must have knowledge, having a familiarity with the central message of the Bible; second, he must have knowledge that is tempered by wisdom that makes his message clear and persuasive; third, he must have the character of a Christian, embodying the virtues of the kingdom he serves. Then, over the course of four chapters, Koukl unveils his tactic. He calls it "The Columbo." The key to this tactic is to "go on the offensive in an inoffensive way by using carefully selected questions to productively advance the conversation." Never make a statement when a question will do the job. When you ask questions and listen carefully, you gather information that can be used to show a person where his thinking is faulty. Questions can be used to gather information, to reverse the burden of proof or to lead the conversation. Either way, the person asking the question is the person who leads the discussion. He sets a modest and realistic goal for his interactions with unbelievers. "My goal," he says, "is to find clever ways to exploit someone's bad thinking for the purpose of guiding her to truth, yet remaining gracious and charitable at the same time. My aim is to manage, not manipulate; to control, not coerce; to finesse, not fight. I want the same for you." The goal of this kind of apologetics, then, is not necessarily to win someone to Christ. That may be an ultimate goal or an ultimate hope, but the goal of an individual encounter is nothing more than, in Koukl's words, "putting a stone in someone's shoe." "I want to give him something worth thinking about, something he can't ignore because it continues to poke at him in a good way." In Part 2 of the book, Koukl offers guidance in finding flaws in the way people reason. He offers specific tactics to unveil poor reasoning and to turn it back against a person. He calls these things like Suicide, Sibling Rivalry, Taking the Roof Off. He offers advice on countering the human steamroller (you've tried to discuss issues with people like this) and the Rhodes scholar, the supposed expert. When I think of Christian apologetics, I tend to think of Evidence that Demands a Verdict or some of the classics of days gone by. But in this book Koukl offers a new approach and one that is well-suited to the times. He teaches the Christian to think well, to exemplify grace and to humbly lead a conversation to the truth. "We may spend hours helping someone carefully work through an issue without ever mentioning God, Jesus or the Bible. This does not mean we aren't advancing the kingdom. It is always a step in the right direction when he help others think more carefully. If nothing else, it gives them tools to assess the bigger questions that eventually come up." Apologetics is not always a discipline that is done with grace. But in this book Koukl shares tactics that will prove beneficial to any Christian. They may just revolutionize the way you interact with unbelievers. I highly recommend it." I give this book 5/5 stars and recommend it to both Christians and atheists alike as well as everyone in between.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2011
F
Verified Purchase
Frances
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Highly recommend
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
I just finished reading tactics; it’s a book every Christian should consider adding to their reading list. So often we either avoid hard conversations about faith or we jump into them unprepared and emotional. This book does such a good job of equipping believers to slow down, ask thoughtful questions, and engage in meaningful dialogue with people who disagree with us. It’s not about “winning arguments,” it’s about learning how to think clearly, respond graciously, and represent Christ well. What I really appreciated is how grounded it is in biblical context. It reinforces the tools we already have as disciples (wisdom, discernment, gentleness, and truth) and shows us how to actually apply them in real conversations. It encourages confidence without arrogance and boldness without hostility. If you’ve ever felt unsure about how to defend your faith or navigate tough discussions, this book is incredibly practical and encouraging.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Bartol CZ
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Cannot recommend this book enough
Greg Koukl’s "Tactics: A game plan for discussing your Christian convictions" is an excellent tool for anyone engaged in everyday conversations with unbelievers. With a mountain of attacks coming at Christians today, it can easily become overwhelming or even defeating for someone who wants to communicate his or her faith. What Koukl sets out to do in this book is to empower his readers to not only not be afraid, but be confident in what they believe, without feeling like the worlds questions are on their shoulders. The first half of this work deals with the game plan. In every day conversations, there are often a lot of claims about the Christian faith that are unfounded, so Koukl’s tactic is primarily a shifting in the burden of proof. He uses the show Columbo as his primary example, as the main character acts like a bumbling fool, but is really a brilliant detective. He will act like a fool to put off his suspect, but then asks incriminating questions to get his suspect to confess. In the same way, when a Christian is given a claim against his or her faith, they do not need to bear the weight of the claim, but can ask for more information and then allow them to defend their conclusions. It is not confrontational and helps the conversation gain some clarity. More often than not, in those moments, the baseless claims are exposed for what they really are, and the Christian is able to deal with the weightier matters of God and the individual. The second half of his book deals with the practicalities of how this tactic can play out. It is no longer an issue of steering the conversation, but of having the practical thinking skills to be a knowledgeable ambassador. A lot of these principles take practice and immersion for it to become a habitual thing, but that’s the first thing that Koukl encourages his readers to do: Try. You will never be able to become proficient at this if you are not entering into conversation with others. The first thing that he encourages us to look out for in this section is the self-refuting questions or objections, which he calls “suicide.” These are views that are inherently contradictory. He said, “When statements fail to meet their own criteria of validity, they are self-refuting.” The concept of truth as universally relative is a good example of this, since it is making the objective truth claim that all truth is subjectively relative. So, it commits suicide by its own assertions. The following chapter shows not only the logical inconsistencies with self-refuting claims, but also the fact that it cannot play out in reality. No one can live (at least consistently) with a worldview that is inherently contradictory. When someone tells you that you cannot judge or that you should not try and change the beliefs of other people, they are in fact doing the very thing that they claim is wrong. One aspect that I particularly enjoyed was his chapter on taking the roof off. This was a deliberate exposition on Francis Schaeffer’s use of reductio ad absurdum. “Whenever someone tries to deny the truth, reality ultimately betrays them.” When a person holds to a false worldview, oftentimes the reductio can help take them to the logical ends of their view. For instance, if someone holds to monism, where all is one and differences are an illusion, then the internal human drive for justice is equally an illusion, and thus a man loving his wife and family has no moral difference in the universe than a man walking into a kindergarten classroom and shooting everyone in sight. Most do not want to deal with the reality of what their worldview allows. But sometimes people, regardless of whether they are proven wrong, will not let you get a word in. His chapter on the steamroller is particularly helpful here. The Christian wants to be the most loving that he or she can possibly be in a conversation, and the steamroller personality will use that to their advantage, as they control the conversation and avoid dealing with their own claims. So, Koukl has the Christian simply stop the conversation, shame the person for being so overbearing, and if that does not work, simply leave. It does not good to try and have a conversation with someone who is not willing to have a conversation. The three things that he ultimately wants his readers to develop are Character, knowledge, and wisdom. With these three combined, the ambassador has enough in his or her arsenal to fight for the hearts and minds of the people he or she engages. Without knowledge, the Christian is ignorant, without wisdom, he or she is without direction in the conversation, and without character, the Christian runs the risk of being a jerk. Koukl said, “My goal… is to find clever ways to exploit someone’s bad thinking for the purpose of guiding her to truth, yet remaining as gracious and charitable at the same time. My aim is to manage not manipulate; to control, not coerce; to finesse, not fight.” He wants the reader to be the best Christian that the non-Christian has ever met. When the focus is on truth and compassion for the other person, it becomes more a matter of putting a stone in their shoe, to make them think, than a series of manipulating maneuvers to get them to convert. This makes room for friendships to develop, rather than confrontations that create an us/them mentality, and, God willing, these encounters will eventually be the means that God uses to save them. While this book is not a how to guide, it does offer some quality introductions to apologetic arguments and a great framework for discussing Christian convictions with those who do not hold to their worldview. Many who are new to apologetics will find a goldmine in this book, and those who are well versed will find an equal amount of value, since he gives a framework for discussion that is winsome and gets to the root of the issues to let the gospel shine. I reference this book often, since this model is the way I try to do apologetics with both Christians and non-Christians.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2014

recommand products